Subject:
|
Re: Part Authors: opinions sought on T-Junctions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Mon, 5 Mar 2007 01:35:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4707 times
|
| |
|
|
--snip--
| |
And even if POV-Ray doesn’t suffer from the problem (which I still don’t know
one way or another), the relatively small number of additional polygons are
likely to have a minimal impact on the performance of POV-Ray. I’d say that
they’re unlikely to have a significant impact of the performance of realtime
viewers also, but since it can provide a noticeable improvement in realtime
viewers, I think it’s more helpful there.
--Travis
|
Just to be clear it’s not the render time I’m worried about... it’s the
authoring time.
Tim
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Part Authors: opinions sought on T-Junctions
|
| (...) It's not really constrained to high zoom. If you have a 1% chance of any given pixel along any given T-junction boundary edge resulting in a hole, then you'll have the roughly the same number of holes at any zoom level, since in general the (...) (17 years ago, 5-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
