To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dat.partsOpen lugnet.cad.dat.parts in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / LDraw Files / Parts / 6093
6092  |  6094
Subject: 
Re: Part Authors: opinions sought on T-Junctions
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
Date: 
Mon, 5 Mar 2007 00:18:48 GMT
Viewed: 
4635 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Don Heyse wrote:
   This is a really old issue. I think the previous consensus was that T-Junctions are bad. Look at the bottom of the message for the comments on T-Junctions.

Much as I’d like to agree on this, I don’t think the fact that nobody posted back then disagreeing with my statement really counts as consensus. I pointed out the problem, but didn’t ask for opinions on whether parts should be modeled that way.

Also, it’s kind of obvious that you and I would be biased on this issue. When people complain that LDView or ldglite aren’t working right, all we can do right now is say, “Too bad. There’s nothing I can do to fix it.” If there were an official policy saying that T-junctions are bad, we could say, “The part needs to be updated.”


   Actually this is such an old issue, I could swear there was an ASCII art illustration of the problem. But I can’t seem to find that anywhere now.

That wouldn’t surprise me. Funny how things change.

--Travis



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Part Authors: opinions sought on T-Junctions
 
(...) Heh, I think I found the (URL) ASCII art>. I coulda sworn it made it into a FAQ somewhere though. Oh well. Have fun, Don (17 years ago, 5-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
  Re: Part Authors: opinions sought on T-Junctions
 
(...) T-junctions are a quality issue in part files. I don't think they should be strictly forbidden (that is, having T-junctions is not a reason to hold a part file from official release). Generally, I wouldn't even say that a part with T-junctions (...) (17 years ago, 5-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Part Authors: opinions sought on T-Junctions
 
(...) This is a really old issue. I think the previous consensus was that (URL) T-Junctions are bad.> Look at the bottom of the message for the comments on T-Junctions. Actually this is such an old issue, I could swear there was an ASCII art (...) (17 years ago, 4-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)

22 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR