To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / 10225
10224  |  10226
Subject: 
Re: Hold on primitives by pneaster
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad
Date: 
Fri, 13 Jun 2003 18:17:13 GMT
Viewed: 
562 times
  
In lugnet.cad, Paul Easter wrote:
In lugnet.cad, Bernd Broich wrote:
Niels Karsdorp <nkp.nkp@hetnet.nl> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:HGBE24.1IJM@lugnet.com...
Sorry, i don't know who pneaster is, but he did put a hold
on some primitives for differences in values. It's me...

I would like to know how these values are to be calculated
(and who calculated the correct values, me or pneaster)
I have had a few emails with the Parts Tracker admin's lately to discuss the
creation of primitives. I was INCORRECTLY using the rounding method that rounded
only the final results. Like this;  round( r* sin( Angle ), 4).

The agreed upon method is r* round( sin( Angle ),4).

I assume that this apply also to parts? Or not, because parts (partsize) won't
be multiplicated as is with primitives.
I created the 9V curve 2867.dat with the 'incorrectly' rounding method witch is
pending in the parts tracker for certification.

Now i changed my VBA calculation utility too, to the agreed method and should
now recalculate all my calculations for the 9v train track point :-( or can i
still go on with the 'incorrectly' method?

I am still not fully sure about another final rounding.
in example;  round( r* round( sin( Angle ), 4), 4)
This is the current method I am using.


<SNIP>

Anyone else care to comment too?

Regards,
Ludo



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Hold on primitives by pneaster
 
(...) I think for parts, you can use either method -- because, as the part author, you are responsible for making all the vertices match up. The point with this discussion, is to support using primitives in parts by creating the primitives in a way (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jun-03, to lugnet.cad)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Hold on primitives by pneaster
 
(...) It's me... (...) I have had a few emails with the Parts Tracker admin's lately to discuss the creation of primitives. I was INCORRECTLY using the rounding method that rounded only the final results. Like this; round( r* sin( Angle ), 4). The (...) (21 years ago, 11-Jun-03, to lugnet.cad)

11 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR