| |
In lugnet.build.schleim, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.build.schleim, Terry Prosper wrote:
| |
In lugnet.build.schleim, John Neal wrote:
| |
Nope. Mine are vastly superior in design:-) Initially I thought to simply
copy those, but when I actually took a look at their design, I knew I could
do a better job, so I did.
|
What’s the difference?
|
Mine design is more complicated. Compare these pics. The first pic is from
a person who claims to have reversed engineered the original TLC rose. The
second is mine:
As you can see, I made a better attempt to simulate more petals on the
interior of the flower. My opinion anyway.
JOHN
|
It’s a beautiful job, John! I like yours better than the originals.
Nicely done!
I may, at some future time, try to ‘reverse engineer’ your roses ;)
Take care,
Dave
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Dozen LEGO Roses
|
| (...) Thanks, Dave. (...) Ohh, sounds complicated:-) Here, I'll make your job easier: (4 URLs) I think these pics reveal the basic idea here. One note-- the interior ring of petals is being held by pressure between the sections of the "stem" (a Ross (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-04, to lugnet.build.schleim, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Dozen LEGO Roses
|
| (...) Mine design is more complicated. Compare these pics. The first pic is from a person who claims to have reversed engineered the original TLC rose. The second is mine: (2 URLs) As you can see, I made a better attempt to simulate more petals on (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-04, to lugnet.build.schleim, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
