 | | Moonbase Corridor Floor Height Should Be Raised 2 Bricks —Jon Palmer
|
| | | Wait. Put down that shovel. This is the deal: We will be adding some new features to the Moonbase Project standard soon. These include vertical corridors, higher horizontal corridors and a a permanent Monorail integration standard. All of these new (...) (21 years ago, 28-Aug-03, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.build, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.events, lugnet.events.nwbrickcon, lugnet.general, lugnet.space, FTX) !!
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Moonbase Corridor Floor Height Should Be Raised 2 Bricks —Jon Palmer
|
| | | | | In lugnet.announce, Jon Palmer wrote: That link should be: (URL) Sigh.. (URL) j o n (URL) zemi.net> (URL) the-shipyard> (21 years ago, 28-Aug-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Moonbase Corridor Floor Height Should Be Raised 2 Bricks —Stephen F. Roberts
|
| | | | | On 18.50 8/28/2003 +0000, Jon Palmer wrote (...) _WWWWEEEELLLLL_ since you brought it up... :-) Why not make it 4 (12, 22, 32, etc). Reasoning: make "ground level" 2 over the baseplate... to allow texture on the moon... Yea, I know its a pain... but (...) (21 years ago, 28-Aug-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Moonbase Corridor Floor Height Should Be Raised 2 Bricks —David Laswell
|
| | | | | | | (...) You mean 24, right? ;P (...) Not necessarily. First of all, you'd have to incorporate the textured edges into the Moonbase Standard, which isn't as easy as it sounds. Aside from that, the texture would run the risk of looking somewhat (...) (21 years ago, 28-Aug-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Moonbase Corridor Floor Height Should Be Raised 2 Bricks —Mark Neumann
|
| | | | | | | Gah, how soon after the poll's closure do you plan to impliment this? How many already have modules for NWBC? Not that raising a module would be all that hard.. Mark snow Daddy Neumann (21 years ago, 28-Aug-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Moonbase Corridor Floor Height Should Be Raised 2 Bricks —Stephen F. Roberts
|
| | | | | | On 22.18 8/28/2003 +0000, Purple Dave wrote (...) Yea... it would end up looking like it does now... but at least with 2 bricks down to go each plate could have some texture. In particular, I was thinking of building some furrows and excavation (...) (21 years ago, 29-Aug-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Moonbase Corridor Floor Height Should Be Raised 2 Bricks —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | (...) I hate to vote against this, but I would have to rebuild my current modules. This change would make it a little less likely that I would supply a module to the next setup that uses this. A thought however would be for some folks to provide (...) (21 years ago, 28-Aug-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Moonbase Corridor Floor Height Should Be Raised 2 Bricks —Chris Giddens
|
| | | | | ya ok. (URL) Admiral Giddens <>< (URL) space. (21 years ago, 28-Aug-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Moonbase Corridor Floor Height Should Be Raised 2 Bricks —Fred Trayers
|
| | | | | (...) By "vertical corridors" do you mean guidelines for multi-level modules? That is, for corridor connections at regular intervals above the "1st floor"? Live it up, -sb (21 years ago, 29-Aug-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Moonbase Corridor Floor Height Should Be Raised 2 Bricks —Jon Palmer
|
| | | | | | "Stickboy" <f_trayers@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:HKCyEn.CKx@lugnet.com... (...) That (...) Right. I'll make a MOC for this in a little bit to explain it further. But basically it's like this: A vertical corridor will stop at 10/20/30/40 etc. (...) (21 years ago, 30-Aug-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Moonbase Corridor Floor Height Should Be Raised 2 Bricks —Adrian Drake
|
| | | | | (...) Just don't think I'll be redesigning the Rigel 7 Module any time soon :) I agree with whoever said to bump it up a little more than 2 to give more room for monorail underneath, though. Don't worry, non-Brickfesters, the Rigel 7 (winner of Best (...) (21 years ago, 29-Aug-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Moonbase Corridor Floor Height Should Be Raised 2 Bricks —David Gregory
|
| | | | | The corridors also need to be 2 studs wider. David "Fuzzy" Gregory (21 years ago, 29-Aug-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Moonbase Corridor Floor Height Should Be Raised 2 Bricks —Jon Palmer
|
| | | | | | "David "Fuzzy" Gregory" <crazylegoman@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:HKEnLM.1tJz@lugnet.com... (...) I see why you're saying this. So the corridor width is 10 to match all the other numbers. But IMO we neither need to change it nor would it be (...) (21 years ago, 30-Aug-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Moonbase Corridor Floor Height Should Be Raised 2 Bricks —David Gregory
|
| | | | | | Actually I didn't even think about the total corridor width being 10 to match the new height. (Total coincidense, really) I just really like having 6 studs of space inside the corridor instead of 4. Minifigs can pass each other without the "excuse (...) (21 years ago, 31-Aug-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Moonbase Corridor Floor Height Should Be Raised 2 Bricks —John P. Henderson
|
| | | | | | (...) I think this line of thinking depends on the "tech level" being envisioned with the Moonbase idea. To me, the very concept of a modular base built on the moon sounds very "near future", like something that NASA and its companions might (...) (21 years ago, 1-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Moonbase Corridor Floor Height Should Be Raised 2 Bricks —Aaron Sneary
|
| | | | | | (...) snipped (...) snipped (...) Hendo, Please be aware that colonization of Mars has begun ((URL) see here>) and the interim alliance of Martian colonists uphold and support the standard 6 wide corridors. I believe the majority of colonists on (...) (21 years ago, 2-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Moonbase Corridor Floor Height Should Be Raised 2 Bricks —John P. Henderson
|
| | | | | (...) I may have missed some conversation. Before I vote, I would need some facts clarified. Is this raising of height specifically to fit a monorail underneath, or is there some unrelated reason? What are the pros and cons to this suggestion? -The (...) (21 years ago, 30-Aug-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Moonbase Corridor Floor Height Should Be Raised 2 Bricks —David Laswell
|
| | | | | | (...) It appears to be an attempt to further standardize the standard, allowing for multiple floors to be added every ten bricks of height. Given that intent, it does make a certain amount of sense to make the first floor height be 10 high rather (...) (21 years ago, 30-Aug-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Moonbase Corridor Floor Height Should Be Raised 2 Bricks —Jason S. Mantor
|
| | | | .I've been playing with a cargo system for moonbases and I think that it would make sense for early moonbases to re-use cargo containers in their structure. The TEU's (twenty foot equivalent units) I've muddled up work well for interconnections, (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Moonbase Corridor Floor Height Should Be Raised 2 Bricks —Jason S. Mantor
|
| | | | Ack, I messsed up. I propose the first level be at 10 and the inter-level spacing be 8 bricks and 1 plate ! That hit's a technic beam compatible spacing and still allow corridors and cargo modules to stack. (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
