| | Galidor, for good or bad Jonathan Lill
|
| | Lego.com now has a page for Galidor and they are updating it apparently in a lead up to the Toy Fair. They started with the large picture of character silhouettes that we saw in a winter catalogue and day by day they seem to be filling them in. So (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| | |
| | | | Re: Galidor, for good or bad Kevin Johnston
|
| | | | (...) Hmmm, a "revolutionary toy concept?" I'm still waiting to hear what distinguishes these from the Socket Poppers action figures I bought about 10 years ago. BTW, I think I saw a TV ad indicating the show debuts this coming weekend. (...) No (...) (23 years ago, 7-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| | | | |
| | | | Re: Galidor, for good or bad Rose Regner
|
| | | | UUGH!! A visit to this site gave me a worm virus. I'll never go back! Rose "Jonathan Lill" <jonathanlill@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:Gr4Ay4.ALo@lugnet.com... (...) a (...) look (...) of (...) silhouette (...) each (...) be (...) than (...) does (...) (23 years ago, 7-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Galidor, for good or bad William R. Ward
|
| | | | | (...) The galidor website does have a virus-like appearance, but I have a very much up-to-date virus scanner that didn't get triggered. What makes you think it gave you a virus? --Bill. (23 years ago, 7-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Galidor, for good or bad Matthew Gerber
|
| | | | | | (...) I was wondering the same thing, especially when Zhengrong started this thread recently: (URL) other than the intentional "animated TRS-80" look of the site, is leading folks to believe that there is a problem? Matt (23 years ago, 7-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Galidor, for good or bad Rose Regner
|
| | | | | Norton Anti-Virus told me that I had a worm virus. Usually considered a reliable source. I scanned my computer after I went to the site because the scripts that it ran concerned me. We have our computer set so that we have to accept scripts in order (...) (23 years ago, 8-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Re: Galidor, for good or bad Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) That is very true. But it's an incremental new era, not a revolutionary one. (...) The first time, except for Bionicle, right? And except for all the licensed add-on bits for the main LEGO brand, right? :) Steve (23 years ago, 7-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Galidor, for good or bad Jonathan Lill
|
| | | | (...) The difference is that Bionicle is not a licensed property, Lego created it. For Star Wars, Jurassic Park, Bob the Builder, Mickey Mouse et al. Lego bought or paid for the license to use those characters, stories, and images. Essentially (...) (23 years ago, 8-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| | | | |