|
|
 | | Re: New Dinosaurs
|
| (...) After having another look, I agree happily. The more parts, the better. (...) Unfortunately, you snipped the rest of my post. The next sentence was begining with "But". I only wanted to say that at that point I did not see any typical (...) (25 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001)
| | | | | Re: New Dinosaurs
|
| (...) It's actually *4* parts. Not identical. You have seen that it is divided symmetrically from side to side, making what you think are two identical parts in the front and back- it's also divided from front to back symetrically, so the body is (...) (25 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
| | | | | New Dinosaurs
|
| (...) Actually we should love those new Raptors and the Pteranodon. I, too, think that they don't look as "cool" as the Spinosaur, but I think it's a great approach of TLC not to make more SPUDs, but add some smaller special parts and build up the (...) (25 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Good photos of Jurassic Park III sets
|
| (...) It's not one big SPUD. I know it looks that way, but it's not. I promise. (...) ??? You know, several people have said that they prefer the premolded dinos because they look better. For my part, I like these new Dino set guys, because they are (...) (25 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Good photos of Jurassic Park III sets
|
| (...) Am I the only one who thinks these dinos look pretty lame? Ah, well, at least the small dinos are made of bricks. What's with the Pteranodon with no beak? I know it's cheaper for production, but I really don't like the continued use of the (...) (25 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
|
|
