Subject:
|
Re: MoC: The Limacion track design is BUILT!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Mon, 29 Jan 2001 03:54:32 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
CMASI@CMASI.CHEM.TULANE.EDUspamless
|
Viewed:
|
2810 times
|
| |
|
|
James Powell wrote:
>
> > Sounds like you need some dynamic breaks. I assume you kill the power on the
> > downhill, but I was just wondering, what if the uphill and downhill parts of
> > the
> > track were separate from the mainline, and a resister was attached across the
> > rails; would this increase the LEGO motors ability to slow the train down?
>
> Na, all I need is a hole in the ground, with a house covering it :). I used to
> run the trains downhill at - throttle settings (in reverse), but the limit of
> traction could be reached with heavy trains. The good thing was that the grade
> was relatively short (about as long as my long passenger train). The bad thing
> was, that there was a 5 segment curve at the bottom...leading out into the
> hallway, so when you _did_ manage a loss of control, it went onto the floor
> about 2 ft below. I tried most everything in the way of developing brakes for
> my trains. I now have a working prototype brake van, which solves many
> problems (but still has some bugs of its own). Lots of fun to experiment with.
>
> James
Ah, I was wondering about reversing the power setting too. Thanks for the info.
Chris
--
PGP public key available upon request.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: MoC: The Limacion track design is BUILT!
|
| (...) Na, all I need is a hole in the ground, with a house covering it :). I used to run the trains downhill at - throttle settings (in reverse), but the limit of traction could be reached with heavy trains. The good thing was that the grade was (...) (26 years ago, 28-Jan-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
