To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 9241
9240  |  9242
Subject: 
Re: New Look for old trains
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Wed, 17 Jan 2001 23:18:54 GMT
Reply-To: 
johnneal@uswest.%nospam%net
Viewed: 
1968 times
  
Christopher Masi wrote:

> John Neal wrote:
> > 
> > This has got to be the most impressive MOC collection of trains in the world,
> > James.  You are one prolific dude, dude:-)  I like the way you end on 8 wides--
> > kind of implies an evolution of sorts! <g,d,r>
> > 
> > Speaking of the 8 wides, regarding the euro box car:
> >  http://www.ee.nmt.edu/~jmathis/train_portfolio/sld044.htm
> > I noticed you have gone to great lengths to offset the sides and roof, but as I
> > look at the proto, I see that the offset is negligible.  I happened to notice
> > this because I have just gone through the same design exercise with a couple of
> > box cars of my own, and I decided to use the breaks in the tall bricks to
> > *imply* the offset, even though they are flush.  Did you ever consider doing
> > this?  (Sorry I don't have pics yet to illustrate).
> > 
> > -John
> 
> John,
> 
>   Are you saying that stacking 1x2 bricks atop each other to make a wall will
> imply an offset because the gap between the adjacent bricks suggests a shadow
> and thus an offset?

Almost:-)  If you use the *tall* 1x2x5 or even better, the 1x3x5, and alternate with
the 1x1x5, you avoid the distracting cross lines and the verticals are fairly
prominent.  I'll see if I can get some pics up of what I am talking about sometime
this week.

-John

> 
> 
> Chris
> 
> P.S. I have given up on the whole offset thing (for now). All the offsets look
> cool, but it just seems too special part intensive for me to do all the time.
> 
> > 
> > James Mathis wrote:
> > 
> > > I have put together a look layout look for several of my train creations.
> > > 
> > > I have tried to pair my model made of LEGO bricks with photos of their
> > > real-life counterparts.
> > > 
> > > I welcome any comments and criticisms regarding organization, presentation,
> > > content, download times, etc.
> > > 
> > > Thanks for taking a look.  Here's the link:
> > > 
> > > http://www.ee.nmt.edu/~jmathis/train_portfolio/index.htm
> > > 
> > > This presentation was generated with Microsoft's PowerPoint application, and
> > > then converted html using PowerPoint's built-in "save as html" function.
> > > 
> > > later,
> > > James Mathis
> 
> --
> PGP public key available upon request.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: New Look for old trains
 
(...) Thanks, I am looking forward to seeing the results, but no need to kill yourself on my account. I understand what you mean. Chris (...) (26 years ago, 18-Jan-01, to lugnet.trains)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: New Look for old trains
 
(...) John, Are you saying that stacking 1x2 bricks atop each other to make a wall will imply an offset because the gap between the adjacent bricks suggests a shadow and thus an offset? Chris P.S. I have given up on the whole offset thing (for now). (...) (26 years ago, 17-Jan-01, to lugnet.trains)

18 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR