 | | Re: motorized points - beating a dead horse —Carlo Ottolina
|
| | | "sebarile-MOBL" <steve.e.barile@intel.com> wrote in message news:G4v1EK.6yF@lugnet.com... (...) problem (...) over (...) *forgiving* (...) <snip> (...) If you don't mind a touch-sensor, you could try this one: (URL) automated point sports 1000+ (...) (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: motorized points - beating a dead horse —Steven Barile
|
| | | | | Carlo, Thanks for the reply! Why use the hinges and 1x2 with rail plate? Is this to strengthen the housing? In my attempts I added a 1x2 plate under the 2 hole 1x6 plate and no 1x4 tile underneth. I can't seem to get to the automated yard picture (...) (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: motorized points - beating a dead horse —Mario Ferrari
|
| | | | | | | "STEVEBAR" <stevebarile@yahoo.com> wrote... (...) to (...) hole (...) diect (...) This is a link to the page (sorry, not yet translated to English). Click on the pictures to enlarge them: (URL) links to the pictures: (URL) >Mario Ferrari built a (...) (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: motorized points - beating a dead horse —Carlo Ottolina
|
| | | | | | "STEVEBAR" <stevebarile@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:G4vp62.Hy8@lugnet.com... (...) to (...) hole (...) diect (...) I used the hinges to keep within the "ItLUG train modules constraints". We specified the rails to be one plate height over the (...) (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: motorized points - beating a dead horse —Steven Barile
|
| | | | | | Thank you both for the replies. It looks like you built a mini-hump yard! Is the other small gray house a de-coupler? SteveB (...) (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: motorized points - beating a dead horse —Carlo Ottolina
|
| | | | | | "sebarile-MOBL" <steve.e.barile@intel.com> wrote in message news:G4wItw.BAy@lugnet.com... (...) Is (...) Yes, Rick Clark's one. Cheers Carlo (24 years ago, 2-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: motorized points - beating a dead horse —John R. Clark
|
| | | | | | Wow. How cool is that!? <grin!> Rick Clark (...) (24 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: motorized points - beating a dead horse —Steven Barile
|
| | | | Carlo, I built this version (see link below) and still the motor tears itself of the plates, once the gear teeth ride up on the top of the rack teeth. If I reduce the power level thru the RCX then there isn't enough torque to overcome the (...) (24 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: motorized points - beating a dead horse —Carlo Ottolina
|
| | | | "STEVEBAR" <stevebarile@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:G4z98v.KA4@lugnet.com... (...) Steve, please try with this demo code (in NQC). I think the "trick" is in the 100 ms output pulse length. task main() { // configura sensore touch su porta 1 (...) (24 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
