 | | Re: economics of set 3225
|
|
I finally completed my 3225 Classic Train last night. It is very relaxing to build at the end of the evening. I have to agree with the majority of previous posts, it is a weird little train. It is cute, but the cars just look 'odd'. The best car (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: economics of set 3225
|
|
It's not a caboose. A caboose has a cupola or a bay window, or at least, a work area for the conductor. It's not a pullman. A pullman has beds, washrooms, a porter's office, etc. It's a coach. It's really pretty simple to remember coach, I think. (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: economics of set 3225
|
|
Larry! What sacrilege. How could TLG be wrong? If they say it is a caboose, it must be! Just put on your Town Jr. glasses and then make a decision as to what it is. (Just kidding, I know it's a coach) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: economics of set 3225
|
|
OK. It is a coach. Larry, have you seen the spring S@H catalog? The catalog has 3225 pictured and points out "Only caboose available for Lego trains!" :) Bryan to wife - "Can you hand me that coach car?" Wife - "Its a caboose... And say please." (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: economics of set 3225
|
|
(...) Yes, and welcome to the debate, even if you've come a bit late. Been thrashed around a bit already. I'd probably have let it slide if you hadn't introduced "Pullman" (1) TLG is wrong. A thing is what it is, not what someone claims it is. This (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: economics of set 3225
|
|
Hay, The TLG has been wrong for years! Long before Town Jr. just look at some of the old S@H catalogs. Robin :) P.S. I like this set(3225) good parts at good price but I think they can do better. (...) (25 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: economics of set 3225
|
|
(...) While we're being pedantic, it's not TLG that is wrong, it's the US Lego Shop at Home service that is wrong. S@H may be part of TLG but it is not TLG. S@H (and LEGO Systems Inc of North America) seem to make up their own names for things (...) (25 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
