To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 5095
5094  |  5096
Subject: 
Re: New train
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Sat, 25 Mar 2000 14:37:42 GMT
Reply-To: 
lar@voyager.AVOIDSPAMnet
Highlighted: 
(details)
Viewed: 
6836 times
  
Ben Fleskes wrote:

> > 
> > We're starting to see a nice variety of "steamroller steamers", my newly • coined
> > term for steamers that use flangeless main drivers that extend back into the
> > interior of the engine.
> > 
> > Anything that uses solid or boxpox drivers is a good candidate for this
> > approach.
> 
> ben>> Larry, would you please elaborate. I do not know what you mean by boxpox
> drivers?  Would those be drive wheels that do not have spokes?

I think Boxpox was a brand name for cast drivers that had small round
holes as their cutouts instead of the more conventional spoked wheels. I
also think people started using the term for any solid (except for round
holes) drivers, deprecating the brandname.

But I am working from memory. I am sure James, who loves to try to catch
me in errors, will amplify.


> ben>> Thanks Larry!  Is it save to say that I got the wheel arrangement right
> for this train?  For if it was wrong, I'd normally expect you to comment as
> such.

On diesels, yes. Steam ain't my bag. So it's not safe to say that. I
didn't go look it up and I don't have it memorised.

> ben>> Was there any doubt?  No sersiously, thanks for the compliments.  And
> when I finish my roundhouse/turntable, I expect to impress you with my solid
> LEGO creation (Legomodular as I think you termed it).  While it's only five
> bricks tall at the base (and not 16), it should still qualify.

You'll have some interface challenges but those can be overcome.

--
Larry Pieniazek - lpieniazek@mercator.com - http://my.voyager.net/lar
http://www.mercator.com. Mercator, the e-business transformation company
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.

Note: this is a family forum!



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: New train
 
(...) Na, you got it just about right. I don't _know_ of any other makers of 'solid' wheels for railway engine use, so I think that it is right to call all wheels like that boxpox wheels. The only class of UK engines I can think of that used them (...) (27 years ago, 25-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: New train
 
(...) touch. (...) ben>> It's a brick. (...) coined (...) ben>> Larry, would you please elaborate. I do not know what you mean by boxpox drivers? Would those be drive wheels that do not have spokes? (...) ben>> Thanks Larry! Is it save to say that I (...) (27 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)

12 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR