Subject:
|
Re: Speculation: Monorail, Disney, Past Coincidence?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Wed, 20 Jan 1999 02:39:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1435 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek writes:
> I'm a purist. No non TLG elements sully my creations. I'm fairly
> pedantic about it(1) too.
> But I'd make a big fat exception for train specific LEGO compatible
> elements that came from elsewhere.
>
> 1 - OK, raise your hand if you're surprised by that admission.. <scans
> globe> Look Ma, no hands!
Beyond surprise- why I am shocked! Last I read you would only use original
Lego string. (I had to replace my own after the cats did something disgusting
with it.)
>
> 2 - or at least slipping, which is what drivers often do if not
> sufficiently sanded.
Sanding! Why that will get you kicked out of a pinewood derby faster than a
speeding locamotive. Oh sorry, we aren't at a pinewood derby, but remembeer
that if your son becomes a scout.
Make it a good day.
Louise
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Speculation: Monorail, Disney, Past Coincidence?
|
| (...) No, I meant the admission that I was pedantic. :-) I may have to give up on TLG string, though. Some darnfools are running the string prices way up in AucZILLA. :-) (...) Sanding drivers is perfectly good form, that's what the sand dome on a (...) (26 years ago, 20-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Speculation: Monorail, Disney, Past Coincidence?
|
| I'm a purist. No non TLG elements sully my creations. I'm fairly pedantic about it(1) too. But I'd make a big fat exception for train specific LEGO compatible elements that came from elsewhere. The PNLTC gang had a project afoot for drivers but it (...) (26 years ago, 20-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
