 | | Re: Train Control —Paul Davidson
|
| | | I used to be into "real" model railroading when I was young, and have been wondering when someone would get DCC to work with Lego. The day someone accomplishes this is probably the day I get into Lego trains. :) -- Paul Davidson Matthew Bates (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | |
| | | | | The Challenge (was Re: Train Control) —Mike Poindexter
|
| | | | You heard it here: Paul Davidson will join the train group as a full fledged trainiac when DCC is perfected with LEGO trains! How many more people will DCC bring into the fold? Only one way to tell... Paul, we will be seeing you here with increasing (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Challenge (was Re: Train Control) —Paul Davidson
|
| | | | Mike Poindexter <lego@poindexter.cc> wrote in message news:FopEn1.Kp7@lugnet.com... (...) tell... (...) Heheh.. I already read the group (I'm interested in trains obviously, I just haven't got any yet). Half the reason I *would* get into lego (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Challenge (was Re: Train Control) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | I just had a random thought as to how TLC could give us some capability to run multiple trains without having to go the whole DCC route. Give us a new train motor which has an IR pickup, and a switch to set it to respond to the A, B, or C motor (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Challenge (was Re: Train Control) —Paul Davidson
|
| | | | | Frank Filz <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:Foq00p.qz@lugnet.com... (...) new (...) the (...) lighting (...) Wouldn't line-of-sight be a problem for trains? I don't know much about Mindstorms infrared sensors specifically, but besides (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The Challenge (was Re: Train Control) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | (...) Theoretically you need it only to change a setting... so just make sure that all your potential crashes happen in front of you! :-) (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The Challenge (was Re: Train Control) —James Powell
|
| | | | | | you'd need to deal with the (...) etc. Only if you want the train to stop in the tunnel. IR (can) have good propagation, my IR remote for my stereo works fine bounced off the wall, but it has to be pointed in somewhat the right direction (1 bounce (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: The Challenge (was Re: Train Control) —Tony Priestman
|
| | | | | | On Sat, 22 Jan 2000, James Powell (<Foqo64.7Ax@lugnet.com>) wrote at 13:30:04 (...) Or you could use magic, and do it with mirrors :-) (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: The Challenge (was Re: Train Control) —Mike Poindexter
|
| | | | | | Tony Priestman <Tony@you-rang.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:n++WUhAZKci4EwO...n.co.uk... (...) but it (...) the (...) Or if you wanted to remain Lego pure, use a stack of silver 2x4 bricks... Mike Poindexter (25 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Challenge (was Re: Train Control) —Dean Husby
|
| | | | (...) There was a thread here a while ago about modifying a motor to supply power to the aux connector that powers an RCX. The RCX powers the Motor. I've done just that. Here are some quick pics: (URL) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
