 | | Re: New Press Release about Power Function Trains —Eric Kingsley
|
| | | (...) I agree that IR is not ideal for all the reasons previously listed. I hope WiFi is a consideration for a later release. Line of site controlers just are not practical for large layouts but I would guess we will find a way to manage. The (...) (17 years ago, 26-Mar-08, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: New Press Release about Power Function Trains —Ralph Hempel
|
| | | | | (...) The nice thing is that the IRLink is a module by itself and there is nothing preventing LEGO from making a module that accepts radio signals in the future. Probably, I'd end up suggesting Bluetooth or Zigbee over Wifi, or even a proprietary (...) (17 years ago, 26-Mar-08, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: New Press Release about Power Function Trains —Ralph Hempel
|
| | | | | (...) Even if it's a different firmware version of the IR link that does not have a timeout feature - that would be an intersting stop-gap. Ralph (17 years ago, 26-Mar-08, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: New Press Release about Power Function Trains —Steven Barile
|
| | | | | For trains the Pf system does NOT require constant communication between the IR receiver and remote. And really how often do you control your trains at a train show. Currently most of us have only one train on a loop at a time at train shows, so you (...) (17 years ago, 27-Mar-08, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: New Press Release about Power Function Trains —Mike Walsh
|
| | | | "Eric Kingsley" <kingsley@nelug.org> wrote in message news:JyCtqy.459@lugnet.com... (...) 4 - 5 years ago when Steve B., Huw M., HoMA, and I were asked to comment on the forthing coming RC train we had a conversation with the LEGO technical people (...) (17 years ago, 30-Mar-08, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
