Subject:
|
Re: Anyone built a curved bridge?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains, lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Tue, 28 Sep 1999 22:43:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
736 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> writes:
> Some theories:
>
> How big are the thumbnails? If they are still pretty big that will
> slow things down. A thumbnail should be no more than 20K or so, • especially
> if you have scads of them.
That's still too big! I try to keep thumbnails under 5Kb, usually 1 to
2Kb. My connection's pretty slow... Larger images should be under 10Kb,
and I try to keep full size images (640x480+) between 20 and 50Kb.
> While using h and w tags does not actually speed up loading, it give
> the *appearance* of faster loading because the browser can render the
> layout before it has fetched all the images. the h and w tags tell it
> how much space to set aside for each image.
Which saves time even if it isn't loading faster because the visitor can
read the text while the images load.
--Bram
Bram Lambrecht / o o \ BramL@juno.com
-------------------oooo-----(_)-----oooo-------------------
WWW: http://www.chuh.org/Students/Bram-Lambrecht/
-----------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Anyone built a curved bridge?
|
| Some theories: How big are the thumbnails? If they are still pretty big that will slow things down. A thumbnail should be no more than 20K or so, especially if you have scads of them. More importantly, are you using height= and width= tags on your (...) (25 years ago, 28-Sep-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.publish)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
