To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 16406
16405  |  16407
Subject: 
Re: MOC Metroliner Add-On Cars
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Tue, 13 Nov 2001 01:54:16 GMT
Viewed: 
2844 times
  
Mike Walsh wrote:
> The problem is clearance both up and down.  If I lower the plate that the
> seats sit on that the poor minifigs are suspended in the observation dome by
> their arms.
> 
> The crux of the problem is the use of the 2x6x2/3 slope element
> (http://img.lugnet.com/ld/2875.gif).
> 
> The Metroliner uses this part for the roof structure and to keep my add-on
> cars consistent with the rest of the Metroliner, I did to.  Using these
> creates a two stud gap for the minifigs to sit in.  Since their arms and
> torsos are wider than two studs it creates a dilema.  I'll have to see if I
> can address the minifig comfort issue but for now, no hats!

All though it might create a bit of a gap, how about using medium slope
roof peaks? These would leave some clearance for the minifig arms to
rest a little lower.

Frank



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: MOC Metroliner Add-On Cars
 
"sheree rosenkrantz" <srosez@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:GMp9zt.61E@lugnet.com... (...) In (...) tails. (...) which (...) high (...) [ ... snipped ... ] The problem is clearance both up and down. If I lower the plate that the seats sit on (...) (25 years ago, 12-Nov-01, to lugnet.trains)

14 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR