| | Santa Fe Numbers Mike Walsh
|
| | After I received my Santa Fe sets yesterday I was thinking about the numbers. Sure it would be nice to have a really low number (like less than 10) but it would also be pretty neat to have a number that corresponds to a classic or favorite LEGO set. (...) (23 years ago, 24-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | |
| | | | Re: Santa Fe Numbers Rob Hendrix
|
| | | | Weoird, but cool. My 354 was a set from 1972, the year I was born. Not really excited about the content, but at least its "town". My other number (94) was from a set which didnt have much info attached to it. But the picture was cool. -Rob "Mike (...) (23 years ago, 24-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Santa Fe Numbers Kurt Eilers
|
| | | | | Rob - Great idea on the numbering. This sounds like it would fit well with the trains. I think that all things like this should be named (or numbered in this case). My favorite set, Croc is something I never came upon. And if you don't mind I am (...) (23 years ago, 24-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Re: Santa Fe Numbers Lawrence Wilkes
|
| | | | "Mike Walsh" <mike_walsh@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:Gs0o3n.A3p@lugnet.com... (...) than (...) to a (...) A4558 or (...) them is (...) Bricks (...) I have a 6027 Bat Lord's Catapult regards lawrence (23 years ago, 24-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Santa Fe Numbers Jason J. Railton
|
| | | | | (...) My Santa Fe just arrived - it's number A3666. From the registry, it looks to be the first one with a '666' in it. The equivalent set <set:3666> is the Fabuland Service Station, btw. [::Turns to side camera::] Grreat. The numbers will remain in (...) (23 years ago, 25-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Santa Fe Numbers Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | (...) Well I got 3605, 3915 and one which I doubt I'll open for a while. Neither of my opened 10020 numbers refers to a set or even a part... YET! But, using google, I did find a real train numbered 3605: (URL) than a Fabuland Service Station any (...) (23 years ago, 27-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Santa Fe Numbers Bert Giesen
|
| | | | | | there was a set numbered 3605, this was a fabuland set (Ricky Raccoon and his Scooter) number 3915 was a keychain (Race Car Driver Key Chain) Bert "Scott A" <eh105jb@mx1.pair.com> wrote in message news:Gs6v2s.8M0@lugnet.com... (...) looks (...) (...) (23 years ago, 27-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Santa Fe Numbers Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | (...) Thanks Bert. I've either mixed up my numbers or keyed the wrong ones into LUGNET... I hope its the latter, as I've already put them in the SF Reg... I can't say I care much for Ricky Raccoon or his Scooter. ;) Thanks again Scott A =+= Have you (...) (23 years ago, 27-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Santa Fe Numbers Tony Hafner
|
| | | | | (...) As opposed to costing another 5p (or whatever in cash), it would more likely show up as a shortcoming of the set elsewhere. Would you be willing to accept an instruction booklet that is abbreviated by 8 pages? How about getting parts that are (...) (23 years ago, 27-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Re: Santa Fe Numbers David Schilling
|
| | | | (...) I hadn't thought to see what my train numbers were as sets before reading this. I might just have the first number that is actually a train and not a Fabuland set, though. (I haven't read every message in this group, so this is only (...) (23 years ago, 4-Mar-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | Re: Santa Fe Numbers Bob Parker
|
| | | | (...) snipped My two numbers correspond to the following sets: <set:758> Storage Tray (ho hum...) and <set:5061> Replacement Motor Wires (is this related to 12 volt train sets?) My Lugnet number is much better: <set:404> Universal Building Set - 467 (...) (23 years ago, 5-Mar-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | Re: Santa Fe Numbers William R. Ward
|
| | | | (...) Ours is A4989, which sadly does not correlate to any LEGO set, according to the LUGNET database. My member number, 874, however, corresponds to an old Technic Accessory Set <set:874>. But I am pleased to report that after many years of trying (...) (23 years ago, 5-Mar-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | Re: Santa Fe Numbers Blake Kunisch
|
| | | | (...) Just received my train today, and unfortunately, while the number doesn't match any set, I'm quite happy with the number I did get... 777 It's pretty low for a release of 10,000 and triple sevens is doubly cool. I think the only other number (...) (23 years ago, 5-Mar-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Santa Fe Numbers Robert Powell
|
| | | | | Oh, Man! That's my LUGNET membership #! Consider a trade? Robert Powell (23 years ago, 5-Mar-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Santa Fe Numbers Aaron Gershon
|
| | | | I got a number that is the same as the LEGO Train set from 1980: A7720. Any interest in this piece? (...) (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |