| |
In lugnet.trains, Huw Millington writes:
>
> "Josh Baakko" <shi_web@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:GnoJJA.Bvz@lugnet.com...
> > In lugnet.trains, Huw Millington writes:
> > > I am pleased to announce my entry into the trains category:
> > >
> > > http://www.btinternet.com/~hmillington/iscc1/
> > >
> > > Huw
> >
> > I was gonna say, make sure one of the workers catches the extra peice the
> > fell below the unloader, but I see its gone in later pics.
>
> As you can see, just in a prototype installation such as this, not all the
> ore makes it through the chute...
>
> Huw
You could always replace the 9v track over the chute with some older 12v
rails then you wouldn't have the ties between them to stop the pieces, and
since you're not needing to power the track at this point it shouldn't be a
problem....of course that's assuming you have some 12v track rails.
jt
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: ISCC: My trains entry
|
| "James J. Trobaugh" <james@ngltc.org> wrote in message news:GnopDn.2B3@lugnet.com... (...) [ ... snipped ... ] (...) a (...) If you don't have any 12v rails, you should be able to get some (along with small train wheels - yeah) early next year when (...) (23 years ago, 2-Dec-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.uk)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: ISCC: My trains entry
|
| "Josh Baakko" <shi_web@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:GnoJJA.Bvz@lugnet.com... (...) As you can see, just in a prototype installation such as this, not all the ore makes it through the chute... Huw (23 years ago, 1-Dec-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.uk)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
