Subject:
|
Re: More train ranting (sorry)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains, lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Thu, 27 May 1999 14:34:08 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpien@ctp.iwantnospam.*StopSpam*com
|
Viewed:
|
1013 times
|
| |
|
|
Eric Brok wrote:
> Come on, uniqueness is not the point.
Agreed.
> It's about new parts that were
> designed for trains. If they use the same piece in other themes as well; so
> much the better. Point in case is whether you recognize the canopy as
> orginally designed for trains, which I do.
Are we talking about the 4561 canopy??? I'm not sure... But if so I do
NOT see that as
designed for trains. (1) At least, not US ones. Don't get me started on
a wishlist of parts that I wish they'd design, I don't have time and I
still haven't cleaned up the drool from the last episode.
1 - even juniorized ones.
--
Larry Pieniazek http://my.voyager.net/lar
FDIC Know your Customer is wounded, thanks to you, but not dead...
See http://www.defendyourprivacy.com for details
For me: No voyager e-mail please. All snail-mail to Ada, please.
- Posting Binaries to RTL causes flamage... Don't do it, please.
- Stick to the facts when posting about others, please.
- This is a family newsgroup, thanks.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: More train ranting (sorry)
|
| Jeff Stembel wrote in message ... (...) the (...) Come on, uniqueness is not the point. It's about new parts that were designed for trains. If they use the same piece in other themes as well; so much the better. Point in case is whether you (...) (25 years ago, 27-May-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
