To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 1316
1315  |  1317
Subject: 
Re: More train ranting (sorry)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains, lugnet.dear-lego
Date: 
Mon, 24 May 1999 13:39:09 GMT
Reply-To: 
cmasi@cmasi+AvoidSpam+.chem.tulane.edu
Viewed: 
3315 times
  
Cool job. To bad so many people had to lose their jobs.

John Kelly wrote:

> I was in Enfield as a model builder.  Went back for a reunion, and a week later
> they laid off 2/3 of the department.  Bad time to be working for LEGO, but I
> did hear that the severence was good....
> 
> -john
> 
> In lugnet.dear-lego, Christopher Masi writes:
> > Hey! I'm 10+ years removed from LEGO Systems Inc. Did you work in Enfield? I • was a
> > factory grunt; how about you?
> > 
> > Chris
> > 
> > John Kelly wrote:
> > 
> > > I have never known LEGO to ever use anything other than their own internal
> > > ideas for what might sell.  Set design and process has always been done in
> > > Demark (But as some of you know that has changed with the restructure of
> > > Futura...)  One of the guys that I knew who used to work on sets talked • about
> > > trying desperately to get LEGO to use some of the dinosaur mania that • occurred
> > > around the Jurassic parks movies to do a type of tie-in.  There was zero
> > > interest.  To be perfectly honest with you, I'm quite surprised that they • would
> > > do a tie-in with Star Wars.  It just hasn't been their style.
> > > 
> > > Think about how long people have wanted to buy bricks in bulk.  Regardless • of
> > > the answer that LEGO officially gives, they just don't want to.  They'll • spin
> > > it nicer than that of course, but frankly they just aren't interested.  We • used
> > > to be able to order bricks by the color shape and size of box in the model
> > > shop, so I don't buy the logistics don't exist story.  It's not a logistics
> > > problem, it's a management decision.
> > > 
> > > I think it's fun to talk about what we'd like to see, but to be honest, I • think
> > > it's mostly dreams.  Although it is probably more possible now that LEGO is
> > > having a more difficult time making sales goals.  Maybe now they'll listen • more
> > > to the fan base they have instead of being so arrogant about what they want • to
> > > produce....
> > > 
> > > john 3
> > > 
> > > just two cents, I'm 5+ years removed from being a LEGO employee now, so who
> > > knows, maybe I'm way off base about how they run the company now.
> > > 
> > > In lugnet.trains, John Neal writes:
> > > > The service pack thread has my undies in a bunch.  Why?  Because it is
> > > > as if we are asking for *so* much, when in reality it is *so* little.
> > > > We are asking (practically begging) TLG to create a product from which
> > > > they will make *a lot* of money.  What possible reason could there be
> > > > for not creating a train window and door pack tomorrow?  I'm serious.
> > > > It *can't* be because they fear they will lose money!  IT WOULD BE THEIR
> > > > BIGGEST SELLER!  It's inconceivable.
> > > > 
> > > > Also, I have a question.  When was the last time a unique train element
> > > > was created?  Different colors don't count.  I'm thinking about how many
> > > > new elements went into the Insectoids, Throwbots, UFO's,themes that will
> > > > die quickly.  Would it hurt to create a few new elements each year for a
> > > > theme that has been wildly successful for 8 YEARS!  It's as if they are
> > > > actually *trying* to kill the theme, by not producing anything unique
> > > > and releasing abysmal sets.
> > > > 
> > > > Someone tell me I'm way off base, and tell me how TLG could possibly
> > > > sabotage the train theme *more* than what they are currently doing.
> > > > 
> > > > <rant off>-John



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: More train ranting (sorry)
 
I was in Enfield as a model builder. Went back for a reunion, and a week later they laid off 2/3 of the department. Bad time to be working for LEGO, but I did hear that the severence was good.... -john (...) was a (...) about (...) occurred (...) (...) (27 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.dear-lego)

17 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR