Subject:
|
Re: Train Questions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Mon, 27 Aug 2001 06:03:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
526 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Adam Wood writes:
> >
> > I think you asked this question (word for word, IIRC) in a different • group.
> > Did you read the answers you got there? I did, and I felt that your
> > questions were answered quite well there, in fact. You might give a read • to
> > responses (or even try using resources here on LUGNET like the guide and
> > instruction scans to answer the questions for yourself) before asking • folks
> > to take the time to answer quite basic questions.
>
> Indeed I did. And though helpful, I was also told in one of the posts (from
> Santosh Bhat) to ask here as well. If I had been thinking, it would have
> been a cross-post to begin with :0P~~~ I was also hoping to get peoples
> opinions rather than what has been writen in a guide, or the scans. ie - Do
> people think monorail is a waste of time, etc.. (Which I have discovered,
> unless I'm patient with a lot of money, it is) And I'm sure that if people
> couldn't be bothered taking time to answer basic questions, then I'm sure
> they wouldn't (Well, -I- wouldn't, unless I had time, which I do today :) )
Fair enough. Probably would have cut down on confusion if you put in a new
post referencing the old one and saying you still had questions, rather than
repeating the old one (what seemed like) word for word.
To the question of "is monorail a waste of time"... I think the answer is
"it depends"...
IMHO we have seen all that there is. If you can be satisfed with that,
knowing that it will cost you a bit to get it, then by all means, go for it.
I know I love it dearly and I was just playing with mine yesterday. But if
you want to get more and different sets beyond what is there and what you
can create for yourself, then no, don't set yourself up for heartbreak,
because, again IMHO, there ain't ever going to be any more new.
Which is a darn shame, it's pretty nifty. Hope I'm wrong. Fear I'm right.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Train Questions
|
| In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek writes: <snip> In case you can't tell which side of the monorail question I was on, put it this way... 'tis better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all. :-) (23 years ago, 27-Aug-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Train Questions
|
| (...) group. (...) to (...) folks (...) Indeed I did. And though helpful, I was also told in one of the posts (from Santosh Bhat) to ask here as well. If I had been thinking, it would have been a cross-post to begin with :0P~~~ I was also hoping to (...) (23 years ago, 27-Aug-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
