Subject:
|
Re: Speed regulator question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Mon, 30 Jul 2001 20:17:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
428 times
|
| |
|
|
I have inserted words that make your statement correct. Without them, I feel
it is false.
In lugnet.trains, Lawrence Wilkes writes:
> But you dont think it would be free do you if it was included in the box?
> The price of the 4558 would just increase by
some non zero amount that is nevertheless less than the actual price of...
> the 4548.
> So I still dont understand why you think this is a pain.
Anything that requires some additional cost or effort may well be percieved
as a pain to someone. I'm sensing that there is some set of things you think
are easy and that you think everyone else ought to see that same exact set
as easy as well. Different people find different things tedious,
unfortunately, so if that's your view, it may not be completely correct.
On the other hand I do think that probing into why things are perceived as
difficult sometimes uncovers simplifications or invalid assumptions that
ought to be fixed.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Speed regulator question
|
| "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:GHAz1D.IK3@lugnet.com... (...) Well, the last time I can find prices when they had the 4560 (turbo train without regulator), 4561 (turbo with regulator) and the 4548 regulator on (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jul-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Speed regulator question
|
| "Adam Murtha" <adammurtha@home.com> wrote in message news:GH9Mut.C4K@lugnet.com... (...) But you dont think it would be free do you if it was included in the box? The price of the 4558 would just increase by the 4548. So I still dont understand why (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jul-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
