To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 11626
11625  |  11627
Subject: 
Re: A few pieces of railroad equipment I designed...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Fri, 8 Jun 2001 15:07:33 GMT
Viewed: 
1569 times
  
Seth,

I really like the comprehensive stake in the CAD LEGO-land that you're taking.

My particular favourite is the monorail.  Very cool.

later,
James Mathis

In lugnet.trains, Seth C. Triggs writes:
> > Seth,
> > 
> >  That is a neat way to design you site.
> 
> Thanks! I really appreciate it. I want to add some more elements, the page
> is a bit Spartan.
> 
> > I wasn't too fond of your HP series,
> 
> Neither am I. The thing with those is that they were created when I was
> basically getting my legs with MLCAD, just feeling around. I think I'm going
> to scrap that design anyway. I want to design a more sleek and longer
> locomotive, one somewhat similar to the TGV and the new GE locomotives for
> the Long Island Railroad. Plus those scenes are too... boring.
> 
> > but I liked your SW and D models. The rendered scenery is a nice touch that adds
> > to the display of your models.
> 
> Thanks! I keep running out of memory when I do it, unfortunately. I wanted
> to have a few more buildings behind the D-27, and more station detail, but
> it didn't work out.
> 
> There are some more drawings of a large railway station in the
> http://www.svamcentral.org/lego/ directory, BTW.
> 
> >  I do have a few questions for you. Are those the actual weights?
> 
> Nope, never built these models. They may be, but I sure don't know, I really
> don't have the pieces to build these. It's a blind guess, really.
> 
> > How did you
> > determine the tractive efforts (assuming that they are actual numbers)?
> 
> Another wild guess, just a guesstimation, if you will.
> 
> > Also,
> > the book I have lists tractive efforts as forces (lbs or kN) but you are listing
> > tractive effort as work (or energy, J)? Which is the right way to express
> > tractive effort?
> 
> I honestly don't remember... I last took Physics in 11th grade, some 6 years
> ago. Now, I do recall that one of my railroad books mentioned tractive
> effort, which I thought was how powerful the train is in pulling its load
> along a route, or something like that.
> 
> 
> >  Oh yeah, there isn't a "Products" link. There is a "Model" link.
> 
> Ooopsie...
> 
> 
> Thanks, Chris. I think my memory is going.
> 
> 
> Talk to ya later,
> 
> -Seth



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: A few pieces of railroad equipment I designed...
 
(...) Thanks! I really appreciate it. I want to add some more elements, the page is a bit Spartan. (...) Neither am I. The thing with those is that they were created when I was basically getting my legs with MLCAD, just feeling around. I think I'm (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jun-01, to lugnet.trains)

8 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR