Subject:
|
Re: Not My Own Train
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Thu, 17 May 2001 20:53:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
603 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Richard W. Schamus writes:
<snipped insights>
> Wow, thanks for the insight John! I always suspected that creativity and
> versatility were scrapped for sake of a set design's monetary bottom line.
> It just kills me (and probably the designers too) that the designers are not
> given as much of a free hand. I'm not the first person to say that in my
> opinion, TLC's departure into juniorism cost them much more than they saved.
> I, like many others, would have paid more for better sets, (well, some more
> anyways). Raising the bar on cost effectiveness would have (IMHO) yeilded
> TLC a healthy profit over the past couple of years rather than losses.
>
> I guess we'll all just have to see whether or not they will test the theory
> of how much the traffic will bear for older styled sets and if it would
> actually be profitable to produce them again.
>
> Rich
Hopefully sets like the new Sopwith Camel sell well enough to convince LEGO
that there is a market for high quality, highly detailed sets. And I would
guess they're also watching sales numbers for the bulk train windows and
doors, as well as the other train accessories.
Personally, I like the new "own trains". They're not designed for fanatics
like us, they're designed for kids - and I think they meet that target
audience pretty well. And besides, they're a good source for parts! <grin>
JohnG, GMLTC
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Not My Own Train
|
| (...) Yes, I hope that the recent fair they are providing us now really helps us help them in their decision making. (...) Within the context you describe, I fully agree. And I also like the parts selection as well. (...) Rich -- Have Fun! C-Ya! (...) (24 years ago, 17-May-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Not My Own Train
|
| (...) Wow, thanks for the insight John! I always suspected that creativity and versatility were scrapped for sake of a set design's monetary bottom line. It just kills me (and probably the designers too) that the designers are not given as much of a (...) (24 years ago, 17-May-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
