|
|
 | | Re: New S@H Catalog
|
| (...) I went to the employee's shop in Billund and the employees can buy sets for the same price shops buy, I don't think they are going to sell sets cheaper. So the money is not going to make it worth. (...) Maybe the entries can show TLC that we (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: New S@H Catalog
|
| (...) I'm not yet convinced it's an honor to have TLC turn my design into something weird and unrecognisable... their track record points to that. (...) Previous practice with prizes has been at MSRP. (...) I think this is supposed to be point 3 (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | My Latest MOC-- a Chateau
|
| This MOC is a departure for me in a couple of ways. Normally, I build trains and train related stuff. After having been to LLC this past summer, I became inspired to create a building that had miniland detail in it, but was minifig scale. So I built (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.build, lugnet.build.arch, lugnet.trains.org) !
| | | | | Re: New S@H Catalog
|
| (...) Well everyone, I consider my designs to be simple enough for LEGO to gobble up. But I too would like some recognition for my designs, if LEGO should incorporate these 'ideas' into future Train sets. But I agree that 'It is our responsibility, (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: Santa Fe locomotive - work in progress (Rev 2)
|
| "Mike Walsh" <mike_walsh@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:G6BD5E.9nD@lugnet.com... (...) LGB (...) URL) (...) are (...) some (...) Rev. 2 of my Santa Fe Warbonnet locomotive is now complete. (URL) version is six studs longer than the previous (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: New S@H Catalog
|
| (...) I wonder if thats how 4561 was created :) (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: Three New Train Cars
|
| (...) No, I don't believe I did make that implication. If you drew that inference where it wasn't implied, I'd say that was sloppy, imprecise, non critical thinking on your part. (...) Well, you're certainly the expert from long practice on sloppy (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: New S@H Catalog
|
| (...) <butts in> No way! Even though I don't own *any* train sets, look out for the Raw Material Shifter in the 13-17 category. I don't really think I need those unimportant pieces like wheels or track.. I've found a way around them. (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: Three New Train Cars
|
| (...) BUT, when admonishing me for "the next time" I gratuitously mention 8 wide, you *imply* that it was thusly *this* time as well. Sloppy, imprecise language is the bane of clear communication... oh well >;^D Program note: Lar and I are just (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: New S@H Catalog
|
| (...) You miss the point. 1. It's an honor which is worth more than money can buy. 2. Maybe it's 100 bucks *at their price* for bricks.... (goes a looong way) 2. Here's a chance to design a set that has *great parts* in it-- think of it as an (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
|
|
