 | | Re: Web Page Update
|
|
That is a very very kickbutt bridge and the overall scene shows what is possible to achieve. But the quantities required to do a whole layout fully scenic-ed boggle the mind. Nice work, nice work indeed. (...) (26 years ago, 16-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Web Page Update
|
|
Thanks, that opening image kinda shows what it's like around our home here, of course the Black Knight is winning the battle :-). The ongoing battle between Lego and Beanies ... but I think I'm winning, I've got the kids playing with the Lego and (...) (26 years ago, 16-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Web Page Update
|
|
(...) Nice pages, Thomas. Though that opening page is _scary_. :-) That bridge scene is beautiful, with the waterfall and fisherman. First-rate work. And the detail... the clear 1x1 rounds on the water... bubbles? What are the fish tail pieces from? (...) (26 years ago, 16-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Speculation: Monorail, Disney, Past Coincidence?
|
|
On Sat, 16 Jan 1999 00:53:08 GMT, "James Mathis" <jmathis@arctic.nmt.edu> wrote: <snipped> (...) It is interesting. Another possible explanation would be that Disney zealousy guards it's trademarks and, upon learning of a "Disney-like Monorail", (...) (26 years ago, 16-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Check out my Union Pacific M10000
|
|
(...) I have one, but I don't know what it's for. It can't be for coal becuase the engine doesn't have a smoke stack and the book said it was modeled after another diesel engine. In this case, does a tender take place of the cabose? cheers - Barbara (...) (26 years ago, 16-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Speculation: Monorail, Disney, Past Coincidence?
|
|
This certainly isn't breaking news. But, it may be relevent in some strange way, as a recent post has mentioned the sincere speculation regarding communication with four LEGO employees distributing and shelving LEGO sets with regard to monorails and (...) (26 years ago, 16-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Check out my Union Pacific M10000
|
|
Larry Pieniazek writes: <snipped other stuff about the UP M10000> <snipped Tom Mc's comments about James Mathis making similar UP M10000 loco for his monorail station> (...) Personally, I'm looking forward to future versions of Barbara's M10000, (...) (26 years ago, 16-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Check out my Union Pacific M10000
|
|
(...) Wow! I've got to pick myself up off the floor for this one. I wasn't expecting much from anyone. :) What a surprize I got. Sometime next week I'll put the original picture that I got the idea from on my website. That's a site to see in itself. (...) (26 years ago, 15-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Check out my Union Pacific M10000
|
|
(...) It's the standard 6 studs wide. At least, I think 6 is the standard. If it was 8 then I could put a door in the back of the pilot house. Alas, the mini-fig shall be trapped in there forever.. :) (...) I agree. However, I tired this but it (...) (26 years ago, 15-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Trains discontinued?
|
|
I did not see that previous post with the list of what was continuing... I just emerged from my Lego Dark Ages... Don't want trains discontinued right when I'm getting back into them :) ... Bryan Alan Shutko wrote in message ... (...) (26 years ago, 15-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
