Subject:
|
Re: Check out my Union Pacific M10000
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Sat, 16 Jan 1999 00:26:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
869 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek writes:
<snipped other stuff about the UP M10000>
<snipped Tom Mc's comments about James Mathis making similar UP M10000 loco for
his monorail station>
> We need to convince him to switch from Mono to dual mode. Currently it's
> Monorail on both levels... I think conventional train at ground level
> would be cool. A station that big actually needs multiple platform
> tracks anyway.
Personally, I'm looking forward to future versions of Barbara's M10000, such as
dressing up the cab section of the engine and building a matching tender.
For my monorail station, a conventional train at ground level would, indeed, be
cool. However, I have had difficulty integrating the two scales (monorail and
conv. train) successfully into one building...and having it look good to me.
later,
James
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Check out my Union Pacific M10000
|
| (...) I have one, but I don't know what it's for. It can't be for coal becuase the engine doesn't have a smoke stack and the book said it was modeled after another diesel engine. In this case, does a tender take place of the cabose? cheers - Barbara (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Check out my Union Pacific M10000
|
| (...) Wow is that a cool engine. No one that I know of has done a US proto steam streamlined yet. It needs a tender, though. I like the black and white too! Your diesel captures the 1920s 30s "boxcab look" that was prevalent before diesels really (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
