 | | Re: Moonbase: Starting to put up the rail standard
|
|
"Xanthra47" <jmantor@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message news:HLBF8K.800@lugnet.com... (...) The platforms don't need to be on top of the wheels, you know. For example: (URL) You could park a standard corridor on yor train that way, and still easily (...) (21 years ago, 16-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: BR50 with more photorealism
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Reinhard "Ben" Beneke wrote: Snip (...) And once again a reply on a posting of myself.... I am proud to announce, the next milestone in photorealistical rendering has been reached now. After overcoming some trouble with the usage (...) (21 years ago, 16-Sep-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad, lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.loc.de, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: motor in set 727
|
|
(...) Hello Niels, since set 702 has been nearly the same as 103 (which ran out in 1975), and since 727 got launched in 1977, I think it is not to probable that a 702 has been sold within that set. But TLC has often used up old "spares" in newer (...) (21 years ago, 16-Sep-03, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Tips&tricks on KRHT's pages.
|
|
Hi! As agreed with Knud R. H.Thomsen I post a link to his new page with Tips&tricks. (URL) find the point very creative BR Sonnich (21 years ago, 16-Sep-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | motor in set 727
|
|
What motor was included in set 727 (12V Locomotive) ? Was it the 702 or 107 (but 12V) ? Peeron doesn't show pictures so I cant determine which one it is. Last saturday I got a second hand 727 with a 702 type motor. Niels (21 years ago, 16-Sep-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Moonbase: Starting to put up the rail standard
|
|
(...) This is going to be impossible to nail down until an actual layout is done at NWBrickCon (hope I spelled that right). Some modules don't have connectors on all sides. I think that someone should take track at NWBC and use it to eyeball trouble (...) (21 years ago, 16-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Moonbase: Starting to put up the rail standard
|
|
(...) That's great and all but most people don't commute to work in mining carts : P We can live with the height, I guess, but what about the width ? An eight stud wide road isn't even wide enough to get realistic cargo containers through : ( 10 (...) (21 years ago, 16-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Moonbase: Starting to put up the rail standard
|
|
(...) Agreed...I have a couple sets of train wheels...(but no motors or modern track) maybe I'll make a sample train car. --Bram (21 years ago, 16-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Moonbase: Starting to put up the rail standard
|
|
"Xanthra47" <jmantor@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message news:HLBF8K.800@lugnet.com... (...) Now that I disagree with. I don't think the standard should bend because we need tall trains. Just make em short. Like Larry said, even some mining carts are (...) (21 years ago, 16-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Moonbase: Starting to put up the rail standard
|
|
Yeah. I'll retract those two rules. They are too limiting. I tried to build a sample train/corridor model and it just doesn't fit : ( I think if we're going to do trains we need to revisit the corridor height/setback again. Even the new 10 brick (...) (21 years ago, 16-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)
|
