| |
In lugnet.loc.au, Andrew Eade writes:
> Suck it Matt, and if you dont like it, stay the hell away from our topics then.
> *STF will soon have teh BIONICLE-Mk-II models up for Viewing* Better
> posability, weapons and all.
> http://www.geocities.com/vestras/index.html
> Slizers:Transformers
>
> In lugnet.loc.au, Matthew Gerber writes:
> >
> > No, no, no, no, no, haven't you heard?
> >
> > According to the more enlightened amongst us, Bionicles are no good, evil
> > bastardazations of the Technic line, and you simply CAN'T do ANYTHING with
> > them. Really. It says so in the .bionicle group, plain as day.
> >
> > I must insist that either 1) the toys you find yourself playing with are NOT
> > Bionicles (because, of course, you couldn't possibly attach other LEGO or
> > Tecnic bits to THEM), or 2) you are having a feverish, delusional dream, and
> > none of what you typed is real.
> >
> > BTW, added this to the .bionicle group to help them see the errors of their
> > ways.
> >
> > Matt
I don't know if I got this wrong but I thought that Matt was just joking in
a sarcastic way - especially when he is saying that you can not possibly
attach any other component to them. I may be wrong... If there is any
problem with the new "bulky" Technic parts is that it is harder (not
impossible) to find other application for them. I've recently tried building
Technic Robots in a studless way and I must say I'm quite pleased with the
results (high maneuverability - low piece count = light weight - compact
design).
Eric.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
