To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.technic.bionicleOpen lugnet.technic.bionicle in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Technic / Bionicle / 785
784  |  786
Subject: 
Re: Bionicles: we can rebuild them...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.technic.bionicle
Date: 
Wed, 4 Jul 2001 19:34:51 GMT
Viewed: 
59 times
  
In lugnet.loc.au, Eric Lanteigne writes:
> > In lugnet.loc.au, Andrew Eade writes:
> > Suck it Matt, and if you dont like it, stay the hell away from our topics then.

> I don't know if I got this wrong but I thought that Matt was just joking in
> a sarcastic way - especially when he is saying that you can not possibly
> attach any other component to them. I may be wrong...  If there is any
> problem with the new "bulky" Technic parts is that it is harder (not
> impossible) to find other application for them. I've recently tried building
> Technic Robots in a studless way and I must say I'm quite pleased with the
> results (high maneuverability - low piece count = light weight - compact
> design).

Thank you for *getting it* Eric. My faith in the readers of LUGNET is restored!

Matt



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Bionicles: we can rebuild them...
 
(...) I don't know if I got this wrong but I thought that Matt was just joking in a sarcastic way - especially when he is saying that you can not possibly attach any other component to them. I may be wrong... If there is any problem with the new (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jul-01, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.technic.bionicle)

9 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR