 | | Re: Large arch bridge geometry - help! —John Neal
|
| | | (...) Pedro- This may or may not be any help, but when I built my 4' swing bridge ((URL) I had never built a technic bridge before. All I did was employ a little trial and error. So I guess my comment would be that a prior command of beam-geometry (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jul-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Large arch bridge geometry - help! —Adrian Egli
|
| | | | | Pedro, John's advise is very good. Experiment! Sure, you might make something that at first you might not like but examine what you've made and ask yourself "How can I change it?" Then again, you'll make something you'll love one moment, come up (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jul-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Large arch bridge geometry - help! —Thomas Avery
|
| | | | | | | (...) Although this advice will result in getting something built, it's very time consuming, and getting the desired result is difficult. My first large truss bridges: (URL) built by trial and error. It took me quite a bit of time to determine the (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jul-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Large arch bridge geometry - help! —Pedro Silva
|
| | | | | | (...) Like I said in a different message, I can't make large scale experimentation in the present (not enough parts). I must therefore restrict to details, and that is why the theoretical approach is so important to me. (...) That is partially the (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jul-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Large arch bridge geometry - help! —Pedro Silva
|
| | | | (...) You are absolutely right - LEGO is about trial and error. And I will use the method, but on a limited basis (to test triangles' sequences, for instance). The reason is I currently own very few technic parts, and I'll only buy the rest *after* (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jul-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
