Subject:
|
Re: Thoughts on 8448 (compared to 8880)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Fri, 7 Jan 2000 03:27:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1128 times
|
| |
|
|
In article <Fny2Mq.L3M@lugnet.com>, "Tim Rueger" <rueger@io.com> wrote:
> Ah. My "problem", then, is that I only buy interesting sets. :^)
>
> I truly admire Lego's design ingenuity, and I really like building
> sets like 8880, 8480, 8868, etc., just to admire their techniques.
I had that same problem too - basically I decided to "sacrifice" my 8480
to make it bulk parts. Plus any small or mid-sized set (8440, etc) winds
up as bulk. I can still build it if I want - in fact picking the parts
from my sorted bins is a lot faster than building from a single boxed
set. I just decided that keeping *everything* in its own box was
seriously cramping my creativity.
Dave Baum
--
reply to: dbaum at enteract dot com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Thoughts on 8448 (compared to 8880)
|
| (...) Ah. My "problem", then, is that I only buy interesting sets. :^) I truly admire Lego's design ingenuity, and I really like building sets like 8880, 8480, 8868, etc., just to admire their techniques. I guess I should start buying up some bulk (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.technic)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
