 | | Re: Truss Joint Construction Details —Thomas Avery
|
| | | (...) No! No more "good-bye" posts, please. No harm done, I think. Just the butting of a few heads. It keeps life interesting. (...) If you solved the rotation problem, then you could work out something with this. Again, the geometry will be more (...) (23 years ago, 14-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Truss Joint Construction Details —Tobbe Arnesson
|
| | | | (...) You have my word :) (...) Yeah, that's always something :) (...) Of course I have never tried to build a bridge or anything that uses a truss (sp?) as of yet. And BTW bridges should be .train or something, it's not Technic! *joking* /Tobbe (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Truss Joint Construction Details —Thomas Avery
|
| | | | (...) LOL Hey! Do you want to start another flame-war? ;-) I've wondered about this myself. I think bridges are of interest to both groups. My bridge is made of mostly Technic parts, and my question was about construction technics involving Technic (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | RE: Truss Joint Construction Details —William Howard
|
| | | | | Why don't we just have one *HUGE* newsgroup and then apply our own e-mail filters! :-)) W PS - I'm not serious! -----Original Message----- From: news-gateway@lugnet.com [mailto:news-gateway...net.com]On Behalf Of Thomas Avery Sent: 15 March 2002 (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Truss Joint Construction Details —Tobbe Arnesson
|
| | | | (...) cp lugnet.train sure, why not .) (still kidding) (...) Yes, but does it qualify as technic when nothings moving? :) (...) Nah, don't think there are enough bridge builders as of yet. /Tobbe (URL) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | RE: Truss Joint Construction Details —William Howard
|
| | | | | How about lugnet.train.bridges...n-problems for the newsgroup? :-)) W -----Original Message----- From: news-gateway@lugnet.com [mailto:news-gateway...net.com]On Behalf Of Tobbe Arnesson Sent: 15 March 2002 15:46 To: lugnet.technic@lugnet.com (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Truss Joint Construction Details —Thomas Avery
|
| | | | (...) Oh, it does move alright. Especially when you drop 16 pounds on it: (URL)Maybe bridges belong somewhere else altoghether. Do you think we need a (...) I dunno about that. Have you seen: (URL) it seems every train layout has at least 2 or 3 (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Truss Joint Construction Details —Tobbe Arnesson
|
| | | | (...) nice and did not drop them at all. BTW what do you use those weights for anyway? I can't see any muscular overload with that amount of weight .) (...) Yes, they exist but I don't think they are that many. I might be wrong though :) I feel they (...) (23 years ago, 16-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Truss Joint Construction Details —Thomas Avery
|
| | | | (...) Well of course! I'm not that crazy ;-) (...) They're my wife's weights, but believe me, if you lift those things a hundred times they do get pretty heavy :-) TJ (23 years ago, 17-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
