Subject:
|
Re: FT vs LEGO pneumatics (was: extensions from hitechnicstuff)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Sat, 10 Nov 2001 19:40:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
171 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.technic, Soh Chio Siong writes:
> Thomas Avery wrote:
> >
> > In lugnet.robotics, Jennifer Clark writes:
> > > I would confirm likewise, the products are excellent indeed and well worth
> > > it - I've used the remote control and lightbricks and they are superb.
> > >
> > > Jennifer
> >
> > I concur as well. I have the remote control unit and it has worked
> > flawlessly. It is packaged very professionally and is easy to incoporate
> > into my models. It's definitely worth it.
> >
> > Although I don't have any of the other products offered, I'm sure they are
> > of the same high quality.
> >
> > TJ
>
> To add, I have, of course, JB's pressure transducer. Besides the
> ultrasonic range sensor, the IR proximity sensor and the magnetic
> compass sensor. They all worked faultlessly and are products of a master
> craftsman indeed.
I noticed on your site you have a bit of a comparison between FT & LEGO
pneumatics. Do you have a comparison of the cylinders? I'm wondering whether FT
have a longer cylinder than LEGO?
Thanks
ROSCO
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: extensions from hitechnicstuff
|
| (...) To add, I have, of course, JB's pressure transducer. Besides the ultrasonic range sensor, the IR proximity sensor and the magnetic compass sensor. They all worked faultlessly and are products of a master craftsman indeed. (23 years ago, 8-Nov-01, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|