Subject:
|
Re: Small Axle
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Wed, 2 May 2001 18:09:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
873 times
|
| |
|
|
"Bram Lambrecht" <bram@cwru.edu> writes:
> Hmm, I'm not sure this is a matter of flexibility. The old
> half-bushings were tighter than the newer ones, which is sometimes
> desirable.
I'm not sure I agree with that one. The old half bushings, the ones
with a full cross axle hole, were actually quite loose, in my opinion.
The later ones, with a "time glass shaped" hole, were tighter.
Then came the third type, without the noches, and with a hole like the
one on the fixed angle connectors.
I'm not sure which one you are refering to when you say "the new
one". If it's the former of the above, it looks like our experience
diverge!
Fredrik
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | RE: Small Axle
|
| (...) were tighter than the newer ones, which is sometimes desirable. They probably changed them for the same reason they changed the friction pins...too hard to remove from constructions. --Bram Bram Lambrecht bram@cwru.edu (URL) (23 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
