Subject:
|
Re: How about ideas for new elements?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Mon, 2 Apr 2001 08:36:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
669 times
|
| |
|
|
Simon Bennett wrote:
> Also why the strange distribution of lift arm lengths - I have found a need
> for a five with teeth on the end holes and for a four and a six without.
I assume they have their reasons :-)
Nevertheless I have resorted to modifying liftarms to meet some of these
requirements myself, for example, cutting up 6 or 7 length liftarms into 2, 3
or 4 length pieces. These can be incredibly useful for bracing and the 4 long
ones can be used in some places where you would use the 1x4 "propellor blade"
part, which seems to be quite rare. My excavator uses such a piece for the
bucket linkage:
http://www.telepresence.strath.ac.uk/jen/lego/excavator.htm
I've also resorted to cutting up the wider liftarms with a bend in them into
smaller pieces, and lo and behold, such parts are now beginning to appear
"officially".
Jennifer Clark
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | How about ideas for new elements?
|
| The threads discussing what new mechanical functions and what new sets we would like in Technic has got me thinking about elements that are logical progressions of existing ones but that don't exist. I often find myself after a version of the 3/4 (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
