| |
David Arnon <arnon@NOSPAMsilicon-value.com> wrote in message
news:GAsMA6.8CH@lugnet.com...
>
> [2] I have to admit that I haven't read big parts of the Terms of Use, but
> still I have been reading LUGNET for a year now, enjoying it and even • posting
> without making too many mistakes (at least that I'm aware of). That's • exactly
> because the use is intuitive and simple.
Keep on postin'!!! We'll let you know if you do anything "un-toward"!!
As for the technic / bionicle thing, I'm pretty much in agreement with you,
and actually suggested at one stage creating a .technic.classic group, but
after a bit of thought realised this probably wasn't the correct solution. I
think your idea (making bionicle etc totally separate groups rather than
"chilrden" of technic) has some merit, and warrants further discussion.
Anyone wanna comment?
ROSCO
[.technic re-instated]
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Bionicle is not Technic
|
| (...) I have little experience with news group and common Internet rules and I've been reading LUGNET only using the web interface [1]. Maybe someone with more knowledge will disagree, but at least to me the whole group hierarchy carries also an (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
