To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.technicOpen lugnet.technic in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Technic / 14651
14650  |  14652
Subject: 
Re: New technique: three position piston control
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Wed, 28 Sep 2005 23:47:45 GMT
Viewed: 
9879 times
  
In lugnet.technic, Mark Bellis wrote:
> In lugnet.technic, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
> > In lugnet.technic, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
> > > In lugnet.technic, Mark Bellis wrote:
> > > 
> > > <snip>
> > > > 
> > > > Interesting stuff!  Should make walkers move more smoothly, with the possibility
> > > > of more groups of legs.  The trick will then be reversing all the groups, since
> > > > it was easier with just two, using two polarity reversers.
> > > > 
> > > > I have a centre-stop mechanism for pneumatic steering for a JCB.  It's not part
> > > > of an automatic system though, since I don't yet have an application for that.
> > > 
> > > Was this single or dual piston?
> > 
> > Mark,
> >   Did I miss your answer on this?
> > Kev
> 
> No, I was so busy at work that I missed a couple of days online!
> 
> I had a look at both, but a dual piston scheme works better for steering because
> of equalising the piston area and pushing at least 3 switches.  In fact I have
> two cylinders in parallel at the moment.  One problem I can foresee with that is
> that there is a net force towards the middle due to the auto-expansion effect,
> so the mechanism in the middle has to have good compressive strength.

<snip>

I used some axle joints to optimise cylinder position limiting in normal logic
> systems (without offset switches) in my Octopus arm.  The base of one axle hole
> is on the end switch and the other end hits the top of the cylinder, limiting
> its contraction to the right amount.  This reduces air usage on the logic board,
> speeding things up a bit.

Do you have a website where I can peruse your work?

> 
> Mark



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: New technique: three position piston control
 
In lugnet.technic, Kevin L. Clague wrote: (SNIP) (...) Sadly not, though I'll upload a lot more to my Brickshelf once my digital camera arrives. That will be better than circuits for explaining the positions of offset switches. I had also planned to (...) (21 years ago, 30-Sep-05, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
  New technique: Cascaded Trinary Pneumatics (aka mid-stop)
 
(...) I have succeeded in directly cascading trinary pneumatic stages (where cylinders stop in the middle). This is a direct development of my mid-stop pneumatic JCB steering mechanism, which I first described here two years ago: (URL) (second (...) (21 years ago, 3-Oct-05, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.loc.uk)  

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: New technique: three position piston control
 
(...) No, I was so busy at work that I missed a couple of days online! I had a look at both, but a dual piston scheme works better for steering because of equalising the piston area and pushing at least 3 switches. In fact I have two cylinders in (...) (21 years ago, 28-Sep-05, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)

20 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR