To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.technicOpen lugnet.technic in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Technic / 14636
14635  |  14637
Subject: 
Re: New technique: three position piston control
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Sun, 25 Sep 2005 21:19:57 GMT
Viewed: 
4603 times
  
In lugnet.technic, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
(SNIP)
I like to make walkers, so typically I make sequencers (circuits that go through
a small set of steps, and then repeate themselves).  To use this mid-stop piston
concept in a walker, I needed a way to tell that the piston had stopped in the
middle.

I realized that to do this, I was going to need to use two switches, and my old
friend hysteresis.  One switch helps us understand that we've traveled from
contracted to the middle, and the other switch lets us know that we've traveled
from expanded to the middle. They are set up such that if we've traveled from
contracted to the middle, and then expanded, then traveled from expanded to the
middle, both switches will let air pressure flow from their center ports, to one
of their left or right ports.  By hooking these switches together serially we
know we're in the middle.

Here is a writeup from my LEGO idea logbook on combination of middle stop
switch, and the middle detect switches:

http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/kclague/MidPiston/midpiston_descr.jpg

Here is a close up of an actual implementation of the mid-piston concept used in
a testbench I created.  The switch on the left is actually unused.  Notice the
two switches in the middle, with the #6 angle connectors.  These are the
mid-piston detection switches.  The #6 angle connectors, combined with the 1x15
liftarm, and the technic axle pins with half bushings, provide the hysteresis
mechanism.

To be sure that this mechanism actually worked, I created a little pneumatic
testbench.  Logically I used three pistons (four actually, but two were combined
to act as one).  One piston was wrappend in mid stop and mid detection switches,
the second was wrapped in OR gate switches, and the third was wrapped in AND
gates to glue them all together.

Here is a writeup from my idea logbook:

http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/kclague/MidPiston/midtest_schematic.jpg

The timing diagram in the upper left hand corner describes what to expect:

  time goes horizontally
  pistons are listed vertically
  up sloping lines means piston expanding
  horizontal lines mean piston unchanged
  down sloping lines mean piston contracting

The critical part of the timing diagram is piston C's waveform:

Notice the piston starts closed, opens to mid, expands fully, contracts to mid,
and finally contracts fully.

Overall the sequence is:

Piston A contracts.
Piston C expands to mid
Piston B contracts
Piston C expands fully
Piston A expands
Piston C contracts to mid
Piston B expands
Piston C contracts fully

Here is a photograph of the actual circuit:

http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/kclague/MidPiston/midpiston_test.jpg

Here is a movie of the circuit in action

http://www.kclague.net/midpiston/mid_piston.avi

Well, that's it!  I'd love to hear from anyone who plays with this mid-piston
concept.

I already have a paper design for a six legged walker with three leg groups
using forward/mid/back leg sweeps (what a surprise!)  It walks using a 9 step
sequence.  It only uses mid-stop on expansion, but not on contraction.

Please let me know what you think.

Kev

Interesting stuff!  Should make walkers move more smoothly, with the possibility
of more groups of legs.  The trick will then be reversing all the groups, since
it was easier with just two, using two polarity reversers.

I have a centre-stop mechanism for pneumatic steering for a JCB.  It's not part
of an automatic system though, since I don't yet have an application for that.

Does your centre stop cylinder stop accurately in the same place every time,
even under different pressure conditions?  I thought if you put a lot of source
pressure into the cylinder it might overshoot the mid-point, whereas with low
pressure it would creep up to it.  Accurate repeatable positioning is one of the
challenges of this scheme.

Mark



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: New technique: three position piston control
 
(...) <snip> (...) The center stop is not the same spot when expanding vs. contracting. I did not try it at different pressures. I just pumped a hand pump as fast as I could to make the sequencer go. I've not seen it overshoot the mid point. (...) (...) (19 years ago, 25-Sep-05, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
  Re: New technique: three position piston control
 
In lugnet.technic, Mark Bellis wrote: <snip> (...) Was this single or dual piston? (...) Kevin (19 years ago, 26-Sep-05, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  New technique: three position piston control
 
Years ago when I first started playing with pneumatics, I first learned that I could control a piston using a switch. I then learned that you could mechanically link a piston and a switch, and have piston controll the switch. I learned from Eric (...) (19 years ago, 24-Sep-05, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.announce.moc) ! 

20 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    
Active threads in Robotics

 
Contact Recovery Nerd for Speedy USDT / BTC Recovery
8 hours ago
 
Different Sensors Available...
23 hours ago
Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR