To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.technicOpen lugnet.technic in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Technic / 11283
11282  |  11284
Subject: 
Re: Shocking news from Brickset
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.technic
Date: 
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 15:00:50 GMT
Viewed: 
1238 times
  
In lugnet.technic, Stéphane Simard wrote:
In lugnet.technic, Tobbe Arnesson wrote:
5. One of the pneumatic cylinders will be replaced by the new type?

I'd say this is the case. But not one of them, probably all of them. Why keep
two different cylinders in production?

That is certainly reason enough to renumber the set. But, the picture we see is
the exact same as set 8431.

If they do use the newer cylinder, with this amount of change, it's getting
further and further away from the original 8460...

If they do, this would need to be reworked:
http://www.hccamsterdam.nl/brick/scans/08000/8460/029.jpg
(given the state Brickshelf is in, I'm glad that site exists, I tend to forget
about it)

I would not mind though.

But if they, say, changed all the Technic beams into the studless type with
lot's of fairings instead of plates - riot! :)

I won't buy this reissue either since I basically already have the parts to
build a copy, but I like it to stick around in case I need to fill up on the
great parts it contains.

I say; Bring back modelteam! Now that would make my wallet hurt... Come to think
about it, don't bring back modelteam! :) I'm having enough trouble convincing
myself *not* bying the ISD as-is...

/Tobbe



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Shocking news from Brickset
 
(...) I certainly would mind. First, people will be getting more than enough new-type cylinders with 8455 and any future pneumatic set. Second, it's illegal to have a picture of a toy that differs from what is inside the box; in the picture we see (...) (21 years ago, 19-Sep-03, to lugnet.technic)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Shocking news from Brickset
 
(...) That is certainly reason enough to renumber the set. But, the picture we see is the exact same as set 8431. If they do use the newer cylinder, with this amount of change, it's getting further and further away from the original 8460... (21 years ago, 19-Sep-03, to lugnet.technic)

9 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR