Subject:
|
Re: Drat Soarer (2nd lego glider)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Fri, 1 Aug 2003 13:39:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
982 times
|
| |
|
|
> Daron,
>
> Congrats on the continued development, but I don't know why you want to make a
> biplane, except for kicks.
>
> The most efficient wing, from a drag reducing perspective, is a long thing one
> (think gliders, and MacReady's man powered planes). Short stubby biplanes wings
> have a lot of drag, and the only reason biplanes existed were because materials
> and design weren't advanced enough in the early days of aviation to make safe,
> strong monoplanes.
Thanks, and I want a biplane because I think its an easier design with lego then
the long wings. Legos have all ways been weaker when they are spread out, even
the wing design I currently use bends towards the end, if I extend it out it
would bend even more. With a biplane I can get the extra lift from the wing with
out the extra strain from the long wings. I will try making a longer wing, I'm
just afraid that legos are not strong enough at long distances just like back
then they could not make strong monoplanes. I know I could make it strong
enough, but that adds more wieght to the design and I really need to keep the
wieght down as much as I can inorder to eventually try powered flight.
Daron
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Drat Soarer (2nd lego glider)
|
| (...) Daron, Congrats on the continued development, but I don't know why you want to make a biplane, except for kicks. The most efficient wing, from a drag reducing perspective, is a long thing one (think gliders, and MacReady's man powered planes). (...) (21 years ago, 1-Aug-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
