 | | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but...
|
|
(...) Agreed! I think that this was the only 1999 set that could stand up to some of the sets from previous years...it has a lot of functionality integrated into a relatively small unit. And yeah, it is a very good example of the fact that high (...) (25 years ago, 26-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Does anyone have a REALLY GOOD photo of the the 8466
|
|
(...) I've also been trying to look for some large pictures of this model but have not had any luck. I have seen one picture of it but it is pretty small (384x288). From the little that I've seen and heard of it though, it looks like a stunning set (...) (25 years ago, 26-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but...
|
|
(...) Not entirely a bad thing but I've been looking in to alot of harvesters for forest use lately and I guess this one is supposed to be some sort of hartvester/lumber crane. (...) Also very clever use of the bent beams to secure things. My (...) (25 years ago, 26-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Does anyone have a REALLY GOOD photo of the the 8466
|
|
Don't have any pictures but this is good news! I thought it would be more expensive. *sigh* Guess I have to convince my g/f once again that this is a relly rare set that is special in so many ways that I want to buy it... But I'll wat for the model (...) (25 years ago, 26-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but...
|
|
(...) Or $35 each, at after-Christmas sales. :) :) Actually, one thing that K'nex (the company) is doing right is to reissue their 'classic sets'. The Roller Coaster and the Big Ball Factory reappear on store shelves every year, right around (...) (25 years ago, 26-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but...
|
|
(...) Indeed, if the green bits were replaced with white it would remind me of one of the Eagle spaceships from Space 1999. A bad Moon series as opposed to bad Mars movie - close enough I think :-) I am still not convinced this is an entirely bad (...) (25 years ago, 26-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Does anyone have a REALLY GOOD photo of the the 8466
|
|
I've found two sites with photos of the 8466 4x4 but when I tried to print them up they weren't that good :-( I'm just guessing these photos were posted in 640x480 but I want to get a better look at the details. Any better photos are welcome. I just (...) (25 years ago, 26-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but...
|
|
(...) I just built the 8446 Monster Crane Truck and I say we just have to learn to use these new parts! I'm truly amazed... Must be one of the best Technic set's from 1999. To bad it looks like something out of a bad Mars movie though... I think (...) (25 years ago, 26-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but...
|
|
(...) And even more so for those of us who don't work with programming things in everyday life and don't want to have to buy super-expensive sets, learn a coding language or even buy a decent computer to play with Lego. Psi (25 years ago, 26-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Call me a Lego purist if you will but...
|
|
(...) Perhaps a more manageable idea (less pieces per bag) would be to organise by colour so: black - 8880, 8860, 8868, 8412 red - 851, 853, 8440, 8837, 8851, 8865 yellow - 850, 852, 856, 8459, 8460, 8828, 8862, 8853 Put me down for one of each - no (...) (25 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
