 | | Re: F1 with transmission (was: Ferrari)
|
|
(...) Difficult, but not impossible: (URL) (20 years ago, 15-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Fabiosali
|
|
Thank you very mutch for the compliments,my model in scale 1/20 and I pilot them through a command to thread, electric and pneumatic. Ciao Fabio "SteP" <stprosse@tin.it> ha scritto nel messaggio news:I8MMK9.t71@lugnet.com... (...) of (...) as (...) (20 years ago, 14-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Ferrari
|
|
(...) I believe you three could build a better one. You guys are talented. I'm not into sports cars unless you consider an old Ford Thunderbird a sportscar. (URL) I think the old 'birds (1955-1966)look better than any other car, but heavy equipment (...) (20 years ago, 14-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Ferrari
|
|
(...) Sure, but the second I can get my hands on one, I'm RC'ing it (just like the 8448) so Marie might 'upgrade' to a new set of wheels-- (URL) down a bit) So I'm looking forward to the Ferrari, suspension or transmission missing or not. And with (...) (20 years ago, 14-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Ferrari
|
|
(...) Hehehe, well, the silver champ has a magnificent suspension, don't forget that, and on top of that, it looks good. Now a formula one racing car with a gearbox would be a little hard to do for TLC, thus I can accept that it doesn't have one. (...) (20 years ago, 14-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Ferrari
|
|
(...) Question- I thought that neither the Silver Champion nor the Williams F-1 racer have a transmission (which are both bigger than lego supercars) and the other technic Ferrari racer does not have a suspension or a transmission. Why is the new (...) (20 years ago, 14-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Ferrari
|
|
(...) Paul (Crowkillers) and I totally agree on this model, it's garbage in it's purest form, it doesn't even look like an Enzo. It indeed doesn't seem to have a suspension, thus it isn't a decent supercar, and I bet it hasn't even got a gearbox. (...) (20 years ago, 14-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: source for 1 x 12 technic beams in red?
|
|
(...) Unfortunately Jonathan lives in Australia, but on the up side, we also have 2 very good LEGO educational suppliers who both stock the supplementary beams sets: (URL) .loc.au (20 years ago, 14-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: source for 1 x 12 technic beams in red?
|
|
Try Lego Education! (...) (20 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: source for 1 x 12 technic beams in red?
|
|
(...) I got a bunch of 1x12 red technic bricks at pick a brick at Legoland and imagination center in CA. If you don't have access to a pick a brick that has any, I would say bricklink. I've always had good success buying on bricklink. Mark (20 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: source for 1 x 12 technic beams in red?
|
|
Damn, I was hoping for a set that is likely to be out there that I could pick up (either current or recent) But as there are none, I need to either hope someone local can sell me what I need or failing that, bricklink is the next best choice. Buying (...) (20 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: source for 1 x 12 technic beams in red?
|
|
(...) If you want to purchase sets: peeron suggests the following: Red: 8 in 8280-1 - Fire Engine / Fire Response Unit (1995) 8 in 8856-1 - Whirlwind Rescue (1992) 8 in 9649-1 - Technology Resource Set (2003) 6 in 9701-1 - Control Lab Building Set (...) (20 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | source for 1 x 12 technic beams in red?
|
|
Can anyone suggest a source for 1 x 12 technic beams in red? Briclink has them but if there is another way to get them that would be preferable. (20 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Fabiosali
|
|
"Nathan Bell" <Radarbell@hotmail.com> ha scritto nel messaggio news:I8L20H.r6s@lugnet.com... (...) different (...) I'm forwarding your message to Fabio (lugnet.org.it.itlug), which is part of our "team": www.abstechnology.org (sorry, only italian (...) (20 years ago, 12-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Fabiosali
|
|
(...) lowboy, the ramps folded, and finally the two drivers shake hands... that was great stuff. Very good pictures too! I hope he posts about his work, as it's quite good. (20 years ago, 12-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Fabiosali
|
|
This guy is good. His style is similar to Dennis Bossman, but uses a different scale. I think his creations work too. (URL) (20 years ago, 12-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: SSClagorpion - Status Report
|
|
Ok, It's December now...any status changes? I've gotten exhausted holding my breath, so I've begun my own.. but must wait until January to buy the rest of the parts I need... (...) (20 years ago, 11-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: The Great Ball Contraption (was Re: Rolling ball clock revisited)
|
|
(...) There will be a minimum throuhgput to solve that. Right now, we're testing with 1 ball/second. So, the very first module will be regulated to run somewhere just below that speed. As long as everyone else can meet the minimum, there will be no (...) (20 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: The Great Ball Contraption (was Re: Rolling ball clock revisited)
|
|
(...) Looks fun ;o) One of my goals when building Bob's clock was to get my feet wet in ball moving... One foreseeable issue: if an upstream unit has more throughput than a downstream one, we shall get ball overflows! Philo (20 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | lego model ideas
|
|
Hey y'all- I have been looking at the lego technic models that have been on the market (like set 8436 or 8868 for example) and a thought occured to me. I don't know if this thought is proper discussion for the Technic section, but here goes. Has (...) (20 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
