Subject:
|
Re: Ferrari
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:00:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3003 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.technic, Nathan Bell wrote:
> Thanks for the info John.
>
> I think "crowkillers" dislikes the model because it does not appear to have
> shocks and the wheels don't appear to be the large size typically used for
> technic supercars. However, I like it. It looks great- especially the wheels.
>
> Do you think it has a smaller-scale transmission? Lego has enough gear sizes to
> do so. It would be nice to see Lego release a technic model of one of the older
> Ferrari's too, like the F-40, Dyno, 308 or 355.
>
> God bless.
Paul (Crowkillers) and I totally agree on this model, it's garbage in it's
purest form, it doesn't even look like an Enzo. It indeed doesn't seem to have a
suspension, thus it isn't a decent supercar, and I bet it hasn't even got a
gearbox. Now this would all be forgivable, if the model would look extremely
cool, but instead, it looks like someone just sat on it. Maybe it's just a first
version, but even for a first version it is excessively bad. I like the new
little truck though
<http://assets.lego.com/images/shop/prod/8419-0000-XX-13-1.jpg> that Lego
published pictures of.
Misha
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Ferrari
|
| (...) Question- I thought that neither the Silver Champion nor the Williams F-1 racer have a transmission (which are both bigger than lego supercars) and the other technic Ferrari racer does not have a suspension or a transmission. Why is the new (...) (20 years ago, 14-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re:Ferrari
|
| Thanks for the info John. I think "crowkillers" dislikes the model because it does not appear to have shocks and the wheels don't appear to be the large size typically used for technic supercars. However, I like it. It looks great- especially the (...) (20 years ago, 1-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
17 Messages in This Thread: ![Re:Ferrari -Nathan Bell (1-Dec-04 to lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Ferrari -Nathan Bell (14-Dec-04 to lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Ferrari -Misha van Beek (14-Dec-04 to lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Ferrari -David Koudys (14-Dec-04 to lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Ferrari -Nathan Bell (14-Dec-04 to lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Ferrari -Steve Dunn (15-Dec-04 to lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Ferrari -Nathan Bell (15-Dec-04 to lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Ferrari -Rob Antonishen (16-Dec-04 to lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Ferrari -Misha van Beek (16-Dec-04 to lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Ferrari -John Guerquin (9-Jan-05 to lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Ferrari -David Arnon (9-Jan-05 to lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Ferrari -Ross Crawford (9-Jan-05 to lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: F1 with transmission (was: Ferrari) -Ross Crawford (15-Dec-04 to lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: F1 with transmission (was: Ferrari) -Misha van Beek (17-Dec-04 to lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Ferrari -Vineet Honkan (18-Jan-05 to lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Ferrari -Misha van Beek (19-Jan-05 to lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|