 | | Re: Studless Technic models
|
|
(...) several of my robot chassis in the past, it honestly never occured to me to use them for mounting motors. I am definately going to have to play around with that idea. Jona (URL) - LEGO Robotics Group of Ann Arbor (21 years ago, 24-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOTIC Self Adaptative Hand.
|
|
(...) Thanks David, it is exactly what I 've tried to built. Hey Eric S..... I' m sure you are scared too !!! ;-) Chris. (21 years ago, 24-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Studless Technic models
|
|
(...) The second picture shows a good sideview, and it looks like he just used some basic plates (and two of the rail-plates normally used to mount that style of motor) to trap a small TECHNIC brick extending out of the side of the motor, which is (...) (21 years ago, 24-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Studless Technic models
|
|
(...) Joe, I see in your linked to model that you have been able to mount motors to a studless chassis. I am wondering if you or anyone else has come upon a "standard" method of doing this? Do you have any other pictures demonstrating how you were (...) (21 years ago, 23-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: 2004 Products see?
|
|
(...) This pics came from this site (URL) and since that post it has been updated with new pictures (great close ups on the pirate sets) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.castle, lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Studless Technic models
|
|
(...) It isn't really like staying compatible with one little obscure product. Many Lego sets use bricks. (...) It's true that studless designs have been around for a while. At first they were used in a few very small Technic sets, then the Star (...) (21 years ago, 23-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Studless Technic models
|
|
(...) like the round wing on his disc-racer: (URL) has since evolved to incude a wide variety of building techniques, all of which have one thing in common. There aren't any studs on top. (...) Of course it is. You use sideways mounted TECHNIC (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Studless Technic models
|
|
(...) I seem to recall a friend of mine having a few that were missing one or both ends, and I know I've heard complaints about the old fringed half-bushings cracking apart, so I can't see how the old fringed plates could possibly be more (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOTIC Self Adaptative Hand.
|
|
(...) Wow, great MOC. The movement is so human like that looking at the hand close is just scary. Excellent work! - David (21 years ago, 23-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | LEGOTIC Self Adaptative Hand.
|
|
All you want to know about LEGOTIC hand is now on my site: (URL) and videos (animated.gif) Have a good visit !! Chris. (21 years ago, 23-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic) !
|
| |
| | Re: Truck MOC
|
|
(...) Hi Erik! That's a very good looking truck so don't get fooled by the non-existing responses on this one. It merely ended up in the wrong group :) I'm cross-posting this to town since it's a minifig scaled truck without any Technic functions (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: Technica
|
|
Okay so I am a little late in the reply but: YAY! Thank you! (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Studless Technic models
|
|
(...) They were perhaps a bit fragile but not that fragile. Here's another version still in production: (URL) Best regards, /Tobbe (URL) (remove SPAM when e-mailing) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Studless Technic models
|
|
(...) Just to clarify; I thought SNOT was more about turning BASIC bricks on other edges then Studs on top (hence SNOT - Studs Not On Top). By turning parts around it creates different offsets etc.. See Bram's BMW as an example of offset building: (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Studless Technic models
|
|
(...) [snip] (...) In fact the RCX *does* have pin holes. Only four of them, but they are there. Two half pin holes on each side. [snip] I guess I'm not the only one who was lots of energy about the studless beam bashing. Kevin (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Studless Technic models
|
|
(...) than two reissued sets, they were pretty much discontinued in 1997, and with good reason. They have fringed ends, which have proven to be very prone to breaking, if I'm not mistaken. Especially when the fringed ends are attached to studs. And (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Studless Technic models
|
|
(...) Personally I'm happy that they have the studless beams, however, I also hope that they keep having the "old" style stud beams. I tend to stick more to robotics (Mindstorms), my recent trebuchet was a rare deviation away from robotics (it was (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Studless Technic models
|
|
(...) Ahem (URL) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Studless Technic models
|
|
(...) This: (URL) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Studless Technic models
|
|
(...) Exactly. And the more reinforcements you have to add, the more _extra_ pieces it requires. To my mind, that's no different than requiring a similar number of extra pieces in instances where you desire full System compatibility. (...) Both (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
