 | | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
(...) I don't mind the helo and boat being a little plane-looking. And I am also sure they are intended to compete with MegaBloks. But I don't buy MB and have been waiting for this stuff from Lego for about three years now! MB is too laden with 2x4 (...) (22 years ago, 5-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam)
|
| |
| | Re: flying helicopter? (was: orrery update)
|
|
(...) Just browsed your site fully and wow cool! A suggestion for your helicopter - if you can build a single rotor with enough lift, why not just build 2 and connect them, like the chinook (URL) way the extra weight is offset by the extra lift 8?) (...) (22 years ago, 5-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
(...) All the spacecraft are brilliant - I particularly like the Arianne 5 and the shuttle. The truck is amazing, though I think the helicopter and boat are a little too plain. They're clearly intended to compete with the MegaBloks models of this (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
BEGIN Instructions (leave intact) -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+- Always reply at the end of the thread! Delete all '<':s, replace the data in the filled in form, leave the empty form in case something goes wrong along the thread. This way there (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
(...) No, they'd never be able to pull it off without a lot of negative publicity. It only takes one complaint to scupper everything. As it is, I suspect there'll be several delays and serious reviews before they finally decide to release it. Even (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam)
|
| |
| | Re: new electrics
|
|
in fact i thought that the axle will be the only electric part i mean the axle should be connected to wire the axles on the ends of wire should replace electric bricks it will allow us to put the axle into a hole and then move along so we would put (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
(...) I am delighted with the lack of mini-figs. Lack of mini-figs means the Lego designers are entirely free to choose the scale to suit the subject (and I guess the parts budget for the set). I have noticed this year that there are many more sets (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
(...) :))) (...) it's absolutelly off-topic but here lies the crux of the matter old polish song "love will forget you everything, cause love is me" (is it understanable? :) pixel (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
(...) once more (as found in <set:8446>) and in the correct number too! (...) <<snip>> (...) So why is there not an absolute ton of them OnLine yet? Don't get me wrong, I am very thankful for what we get and it seems we'll get bits and pieces (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
(...) I don't mind at all. (...) I'm not. (...) Isn't that very unpractial? Especially when it comes to Technic with motors, pins etc.? (...) "Romance is when you can't stand to be apart, love is when you allow it." Another freely translated Swedish (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
