 | | Re: new MOC: FireWasp
|
|
Hey, you're welcome to your opinion and I'm certainly not going to bash you for it. While I agree that the bionicle parts do seem to be "hanging on", they are, after all, a different color then the rest of the model (that pseudo-silver as opposed to (...) (22 years ago, 28-Oct-02, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: new MOC: FireWasp
|
|
Nifty Adrian. I quite like the versatility of those wings...all the configurations really ups the play value. I see the canopy for a black Nuva sitting in the bin and keep wondering how I'm going to use it. I think I now know how....tanx! Cheers, -G (...) (22 years ago, 28-Oct-02, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Beef about LEGO motors (rant)
|
|
"Mark Riley" <markril@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:H4LzAu.965@lugnet.com... (...) have a look that all of thise units are much bigger than technic motor so I think that lego has to think about positioning and bearing the axle notice that (...) (22 years ago, 28-Oct-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: new MOC: FireWasp
|
|
Hello, Adrian, While the piece use is awesome, and the studless design is really neat, I dunno about the all the bionicle stuff. In Jon's M-Wing, and in your awesome Megaera, the bionicle pieces are used to supplement the overall shape of the model, (...) (22 years ago, 28-Oct-02, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: something i said?
|
|
"Mike Fusion" <mikefusion@hotmail.com> wrote in news:H4B03D.6B5@lugnet.com: (...) LOL, not really neccessary, but appreciated. Thanks. (22 years ago, 27-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | new MOC: FireWasp
|
|
Wasn't there some complaining in .space about nothing new happening? Well, how about this. Here's a little ship I built over the weekend after getting inspired by a couple of the new Bionicle Nuva sets. First was Palmer's M-Wing, then my Megaera, (...) (22 years ago, 27-Oct-02, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Beef about LEGO motors (rant)
|
|
(...) When looking at the axle piece from the motor it seems there is plenty of space, and the redesign of that part would suffice. But then I'm not a mechanical engineer. Jürgen (22 years ago, 27-Oct-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Beef about LEGO motors (rant)
|
|
(...) You know, I found myself having *exactly* the same problem a month ago when I was trying to decide where to put the motors in a custom model. There were some very good spots where the motors would have fit in quite snugly but the geartrain was (...) (22 years ago, 27-Oct-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Beef about LEGO motors (rant)
|
|
(...) You could always search for a few of these (URL) (22 years ago, 27-Oct-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Beef about LEGO motors (rant)
|
|
As an afterthought... Lego must have realized the problem because the Microscout, Manas motor unit, and Spybots ALL use an axle socket for motor output! With the recent revision of the 9V motors, it would have been nice if they could have (...) (22 years ago, 26-Oct-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Beef about LEGO motors (rant)
|
|
No, it's not just you... I've found myself many times in the same predicament, and just like you, end up doing something less compact to get around the problem. I haven't peeked inside one of the motors, but I suspect there's probably not a lot of (...) (22 years ago, 26-Oct-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Beef about LEGO motors (rant)
|
|
You mean like the gear reduction unit in 872? See (URL) for details. You basically have a 4L axle bushing running across the block at the bottom, and a 2L in the middle. Very useful thing to have... Duq "Mark Tarrabain" <markt@lynx.SPAMBLOCK.net> (...) (22 years ago, 26-Oct-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Beef about LEGO motors (rant)
|
|
Actually that's a pretty good idea, not bad at all. Just think before those axle joiners came out, I used to use a couple of z24s linked together using the axle slotsto extend the output. Legomaster www.mylegomaster.com (22 years ago, 26-Oct-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Beef about LEGO motors (rant)
|
|
I've often wondered why it was that LEGO decided, when making their technic motors, to have them with such a ridiculously short axle that you almost ALWAYS will need to use an axle joiner to extend it. What would have made more sense (at least to (...) (22 years ago, 26-Oct-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Look what I did
|
|
I've put a black one in now and this one's stayed intact. Steve (22 years ago, 26-Oct-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: Synchro
|
|
(...) It's my first site update since spring. It never rains, it pours... (...) Glad to give a little tiny amount back :) (22 years ago, 26-Oct-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: Synchro
|
|
I didn't realize you have been so busy! Wow! Wow! Wow! Um, Wow! Just beautiful! Thank YOU for the inspiration! Legomaster (...) (22 years ago, 25-Oct-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Look what I did
|
|
(...) Possibly for some, but that boom used at least 60 (most of which were previously unused), probably half were grey, and I couldn't hold the boom horizontally with the grey ones on the bottom (it would bend and fail), but with them on the top, (...) (22 years ago, 25-Oct-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Look what I did
|
|
(...) A quick test with two lt grey joiners and three of other colors could not confirm your results. 1 lt grey was loose, the other was quite tight. Could it be that you have used your lt greys more than your other colors, and they are more worn? (22 years ago, 25-Oct-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | New MOC: Synchro
|
|
Yes, I've been busy :) Third new Technic MOC is a Synchro platform: (URL) /Tobbe #1793 (URL) (22 years ago, 25-Oct-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.announce.moc)
|
