Subject:
|
Re: Beef about LEGO motors (rant)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Sun, 27 Oct 2002 00:18:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1284 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Mark Tarrabain writes:
> I've often wondered why it was that LEGO decided, when making their
> technic motors, to have them with such a ridiculously short axle that
> you almost ALWAYS will need to use an axle joiner to extend it. What
> would have made more sense (at least to me) is to not have an axle in
> them at all... instead, have something a lot like an axle bushing in
> them that you can plug in whatever axle length happens to best suit your
> design. If a short one will work, then you plunk in a short one, if you
> need a long one, then you use a longer one. Actually the biggest
> problem I have with using axle joiners on the motor's axle is that it
> seems like 9 times out of ten the place along the axle where I would
> have wanted to place some sort of gear mechanism is along the place
> _where_ the axle joiner happens to cover -- so I have to rethink my
> design, usually resulting in a model that is probably not as compact.
>
> Okay... I realize that this topic may be a bit pedantic, but I'm just
> wondering... is it just me? Or does this annoy other people as well?
You could always search for a few of these http://guide.lugnet.com/set/845
ROSCO
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Beef about LEGO motors (rant)
|
| I've often wondered why it was that LEGO decided, when making their technic motors, to have them with such a ridiculously short axle that you almost ALWAYS will need to use an axle joiner to extend it. What would have made more sense (at least to (...) (22 years ago, 26-Oct-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
