Subject:
|
Re: Sorting Bley and Chocolate Brown
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.storage
|
Date:
|
Sat, 22 Jan 2005 18:25:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
7236 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.storage, Mark Bellis wrote:
| |
Given that the bleys and chocolate brown are here to stay, what is the best
way to sort them into a large collection, whilst still maintaining the ability
to distinguish light bley from light grey?
|
The newer ‘Stone’ colors tend to have a more obvious blue component, while the
older classic shades of gray tend more towards a yellow shift. For the browns,
the original shade is the darker of the two. The new shade of brown has more
red.
I keep a sample board of all the colors that I have obtained (1x2s preferred,
but when I don’t have them I use something to simulate one).
Here is a picture of the board. The
tags for 44 and 47 I think are incorrect (should be MdOrange and MdLime).
When trying to differentiate between Gray and MdStone, I compare them under a
bright desk lamp. Under that lighting, the yellow vs blue is usually visible.
Ray
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Sorting Bley and Chocolate Brown
|
| Given that the bleys and chocolate brown are here to stay, what is the best way to sort them into a large collection, whilst still maintaining the ability to distinguish light bley from light grey? I currently sort by type, since up to now it has (...) (19 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.storage, lugnet.color)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
